1985
DOI: 10.1016/0361-3658(85)90028-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specialized bacterial strains for the removal of dichloromethane from industrial waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…strain DM2, 2.5 mkat/kg of protein; strain DMll, 9 mkat/ kg of protein (Scholtz et al 1988). We thus suspect that improved rates of anaerobic degradation of DCM in wastes can be attained, because Gfilli & Leisinger's (1985) fluidized bed effectively depended on the activity of strain DM2, which has the same specific degradation rate for DCM as our anaerobic mixed culture. On the other hand, growth of the anaerobic mixed culture in DCMsalts medium is subject to inhibition by components in the groundwater.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…strain DM2, 2.5 mkat/kg of protein; strain DMll, 9 mkat/ kg of protein (Scholtz et al 1988). We thus suspect that improved rates of anaerobic degradation of DCM in wastes can be attained, because Gfilli & Leisinger's (1985) fluidized bed effectively depended on the activity of strain DM2, which has the same specific degradation rate for DCM as our anaerobic mixed culture. On the other hand, growth of the anaerobic mixed culture in DCMsalts medium is subject to inhibition by components in the groundwater.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(kg charcoal), is much lower than G~lli & Leisinger's (1985) aerobic fluidized bed (1.6 g DCM/h.1): they were using a salts medium saturated with DCM (as the sole organic component) in a technically complex model system which produced large amounts of biomass (about 12 g dry weight/mol DCM) at 30 ° C, and they attained an efficiency of 99.9%. The efficiency of our fixed-bed reactor for the removal of DCM from contaminated groundwater (> 99.99%, Table 1) rivals that of Gfilli & Leisinger (1985) and has the advantages that (1) no (pure) oxygen must be pumped into the system, (2) no fluidized bed must be maintained and, (3) very little biomass must be disposed of. We calculate that 45kg dry weight of biomass was produced from DCM during three years operation, an amount that did not significantly alter the fluid dynamics of a system with llm 3 of interstitial space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both aerobic methylotrophic bacteria (Leisinger et al, 1994) and a strictly anaerobic acetogenic bacterium (Ma$ gli et al, 1998) growing with DCM as the sole carbon and energy source have been isolated. A set of 14 aerobic DCM-utilizing bacteria (strains DM1-DM14) has previously been isolated from soils and waters contaminated with the compound (Brunner et al, 1980 ;Stucki et al, 1981 ;Gaelli & Leisinger, 1985 ;Scholtz et Abbreviations : DCM, dichloromethane ; GSH, reduced glutathione ; PMS, phenazine methosulfate ; RuBP, ribulose bisphosphate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few of these compounds, generally with a low level of chlorination, are subject to aerobic degradation [ [2][3][4][5][6][7] or transformation [8-10; see also 11], and some of these degradative capacities can be applied to waste or water treatment [5,12,13]. But for the most part, the highly chlorinated solvents are subject only to anaerobic transformation [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%