2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
610
3
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 690 publications
(684 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
31
610
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a bitrophic explanation argues that specialist and generalist herbivores have different direct effects on plants (e.g., increased damage from more specialized herbivore fauna; ref. 36). The significant effect of proportion S on damage did not hold for bird-excluded branches alone (R 2 = 0.15, P = 0.34; PIC, R 2 = 0.29, P = 0.17), indicating that any direct effect of herbivore assemblage diet breadth on plant damage was not responsible for the pattern we observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For example, a bitrophic explanation argues that specialist and generalist herbivores have different direct effects on plants (e.g., increased damage from more specialized herbivore fauna; ref. 36). The significant effect of proportion S on damage did not hold for bird-excluded branches alone (R 2 = 0.15, P = 0.34; PIC, R 2 = 0.29, P = 0.17), indicating that any direct effect of herbivore assemblage diet breadth on plant damage was not responsible for the pattern we observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In the case of Spiraea tomentosa, plants were not protected against damage by E. clorana, despite their high concentration of defence compounds (soluble phenols and condensed tannins). According to the general hypothesis that insect specialists, which include E. clorana, are better able to withstand the presence of repellents than are generalists (Mathur et al 2011;Ali and Agrawal 2012), it is possible that even the high concentration of defence compounds in Spiraea tomentosa leaves did not act as a sufficient barrier to E. clorana. Paradoxically, these compounds may be beneficial for an insect, as larvae sequester plant-derived compounds and the defensive traits of caterpillars are correlated with the defensive traits of their hosts (Bowers 1990;Wheeler et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induction of Bo-Pr1 at later time points suggest that there could be a shift to an enhanced pathogen defenses by CL frass in cabbage over time. (Ali and Agrawal 2012;Pashley 1986). We have shown that frass proteins from FAW caterpillars fed on maize trigger a pathogen defense response when they deposit their frass in the enclosed feeding sites of the whorls .…”
Section: Cabbage Looper Frass Triggers An Oscillating Pattern Of Herbmentioning
confidence: 99%