2007
DOI: 10.1177/0533316407077067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special Section: Group Supervision of Individual Therapy

Abstract: In the course of my professional evolution as an individual therapist, I often had the experience of supervision in a group. Sometimes it was individual supervision in the presence of a group. Usually it was an occasion for group members to take part in a clinical discussion of the case presented, where one can certainly learn much from listening and reacting to another therapist at work. However, group process was not employed for the purposes of supervision -and the group process is the focus of this article. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that further research needs to be done on supervisory alliances in alternative models for group supervision; that is, peer group supervision (Counselman & Weber, ). In this respect, it would be interesting to remember Kalai's () distinction between individual supervision in the presence of a group and group supervision employing group processes. Berman and Berger () argue that employing group processes, that is reverie and matrix, can enhance the productivity of group supervision.…”
Section: Limitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that further research needs to be done on supervisory alliances in alternative models for group supervision; that is, peer group supervision (Counselman & Weber, ). In this respect, it would be interesting to remember Kalai's () distinction between individual supervision in the presence of a group and group supervision employing group processes. Berman and Berger () argue that employing group processes, that is reverie and matrix, can enhance the productivity of group supervision.…”
Section: Limitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Berman and Berger, 2007: 245) Thus, a collective 'group reverie' is co-created by associations and associations to associations in a similar way to what Foulkes (1964: 117) termed 'free floating discussion'. Kalai (2007) bases her supervision model on a Winnicottian 'squiggle-like-reverie' input from group members in a similar way to Berman and Berger.…”
Section: The Use Of Reverie In the Psycho-analytic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%