2018
DOI: 10.1097/01.eem.0000535016.26988.2d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A pilot study of ‘111’, a non-emergency number (based on the 101 service), providing coverage for non-emergency healthcare, was shown to allow the NHS to deal more with serious, emergency, life-threatening cases instead of non-emergency incidents (Murphy et al, 2008). Additionally, a similar study undertaken in Wales found positive results when pilot studies were assessed in both 2010 and 2012 (Griffiths, 2014). This perhaps emphasises the validity of such an approach, with a health service similarly under pressure reducing the burden of calls on its limited resources and increasingly saving funds while providing a universal service to the public.…”
Section: The Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…A pilot study of ‘111’, a non-emergency number (based on the 101 service), providing coverage for non-emergency healthcare, was shown to allow the NHS to deal more with serious, emergency, life-threatening cases instead of non-emergency incidents (Murphy et al, 2008). Additionally, a similar study undertaken in Wales found positive results when pilot studies were assessed in both 2010 and 2012 (Griffiths, 2014). This perhaps emphasises the validity of such an approach, with a health service similarly under pressure reducing the burden of calls on its limited resources and increasingly saving funds while providing a universal service to the public.…”
Section: The Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%