Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias 2011
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4377-1368-8.00025-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special Problems in Ablation of Accessory Pathways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The incidence of multiple APs is 3%-13% and may pose a the AP when comparing antidromic and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia; and (e) change from orthodromic to antidromic reciprocating tachycardia or vice versa. 4 The reported success rate for the ablation of multiple AP is 86%-98%. 4 Failure to recognize the presence of more than one pathway is cited as a reason for the acute failure of ablation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 The incidence of multiple APs is 3%-13% and may pose a the AP when comparing antidromic and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia; and (e) change from orthodromic to antidromic reciprocating tachycardia or vice versa. 4 The reported success rate for the ablation of multiple AP is 86%-98%. 4 Failure to recognize the presence of more than one pathway is cited as a reason for the acute failure of ablation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The reported success rate for the ablation of multiple AP is 86%-98%. 4 Failure to recognize the presence of more than one pathway is cited as a reason for the acute failure of ablation. In a case series of 89 patients who had previously undergone failed Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) ablation, multiple or large APs were seen in 13 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%