2017
DOI: 10.1519/ssc.0000000000000316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special Populations: Training the Pregnant Client

Abstract: THE BENEFITS OF PRENATAL EXERCISE ARE EXTENSIVE FOR THE MOTHER AND CHILD. AEROBIC AND RESISTANCE TRAINING ARE SAFE WITH PROPER MODIFICATIONS SPECIFIC TO THE CLIENT'S NEEDS AND ADVANCING GESTATION. TRAINING A PRENATAL CLIENT REQUIRES UNDERSTANDING OF THE PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES OF PREGNANCY TO OPTIMIZE THE EXERCISE PRESCRIPTION AND RESULTING OUTCOMES.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2003 Sorensen, a nurse, recognized the serious health risks for college student athletes who conceal pregnancy and began a national conversation on the problem by writing to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA; Sorensen, personal letter to R. Stallman, Director of Education Outreach, NCAA, 2003). The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights (OCR) strongly reinforced its prohibition of pregnancy discrimination in college athletics (Monroe, 2007) in response to numerous published anecdotes of pregnant student athletes feeling pressured to choose between concealing or aborting their pregnancies and losing financial aid (e.g., Rosenberg, 2004;Rovegno, 2007) and in response to NCAA member schools' independent advocacy to protect pregnant student athletes (Rosenberg, 2004;Smith, 2004;Sorensen et al, 2009). In 2008 the NCAA developed Pregnant and Parenting Student Athletes: Resources and Model Policies (Hogshead-Makar & Sorensen, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2003 Sorensen, a nurse, recognized the serious health risks for college student athletes who conceal pregnancy and began a national conversation on the problem by writing to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA; Sorensen, personal letter to R. Stallman, Director of Education Outreach, NCAA, 2003). The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights (OCR) strongly reinforced its prohibition of pregnancy discrimination in college athletics (Monroe, 2007) in response to numerous published anecdotes of pregnant student athletes feeling pressured to choose between concealing or aborting their pregnancies and losing financial aid (e.g., Rosenberg, 2004;Rovegno, 2007) and in response to NCAA member schools' independent advocacy to protect pregnant student athletes (Rosenberg, 2004;Smith, 2004;Sorensen et al, 2009). In 2008 the NCAA developed Pregnant and Parenting Student Athletes: Resources and Model Policies (Hogshead-Makar & Sorensen, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%