2013
DOI: 10.1080/10413200.2012.729378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special Issue on Single-Case Research in Sport Psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to some past research (Turner & Barker, 2013) that standardized sessions across participants, unreflective of the idiosyncrasies of using REBT with athletes. The use of an idiographic single-case design in the current study is important because accountability through intervention evaluation is one of the most essential issues underpinning professional practice (Barker, Mellalieu, McCarthy, Jones, & Moran, 2013). Single-case experimental designs are advantageous because they more readily permit the intensive investigation of each subject and data from just a few subjects tell a story (Normand, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to some past research (Turner & Barker, 2013) that standardized sessions across participants, unreflective of the idiosyncrasies of using REBT with athletes. The use of an idiographic single-case design in the current study is important because accountability through intervention evaluation is one of the most essential issues underpinning professional practice (Barker, Mellalieu, McCarthy, Jones, & Moran, 2013). Single-case experimental designs are advantageous because they more readily permit the intensive investigation of each subject and data from just a few subjects tell a story (Normand, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las participantes recibieron la misma intervención, pero en diferentes momentos, con la finalidad de que los cambios en las variables objetivos pudieran ser atribuibles a la intervención, en lugar de a factores externos (Kazdin, 2011). En psicología del deporte se alienta a las investigadoras a desarrollar este tipo de diseños con la finalidad de ampliar el conocimiento sobre la efectividad de las intervenciones experimentales con uno o pocos casos, permitiendo evaluar de manera rigurosa los matices individuales y posibilitando el seguimiento del progreso durante el transcurso de la intervención (Barker et al, 2013;Normand, 2016).…”
Section: Diseñounclassified
“…Readers will then be in a position to critically evaluate the adequacy of the study, as well as to replicate and validate the research. Clinicians and researchers who want guidance on how to design, conduct and analyse data for single-case experiments should consult any of the many current textbooks and reports (e.g., Barker, McCarthy, Jones, & Moran, 2011; Barlow et al, 2009; Gast & Ledford, 2014; Horner et al, 2005; Kazdin, 2011; Kennedy, 2005; Kratochwill et al, 2013; Kratochwill & Levin, 2014; Morgan & Morgan, 2009; Riley-Tillman & Burns, 2009; Vannest, Davis, & Parker, 2013), as well as recent special issues of journals (e.g., Journal of Behavioral Education in 2012, Remedial and Special Education in 2013, the Journal of School Psychology and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation in 2014, Aphasiology in 2015) and methodological quality recommendations (Horner et al, 2005; Kratochwill et al, 2013; Maggin et al, 2014; Smith, 2012; Tate et al, 2013b). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%