2021
DOI: 10.1177/13657127211055230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special investigative measures: Comparison of the Serbian Criminal Procedure Code with the European Court of Human Rights Standards

Abstract: This paper is focused on several important issues that deal with special investigation measures. The main perspective of the analysis is based on the ECtHR case law on this issue. Two issues are from primary interests: secret monitoring of communication and undercover investigator. Intensive ICT development enables various modern techniques and methods of crime investigation but also results in some new types of crime that could be committed using ICT. Expansion of the fundamental rights and their protection, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the well-known case Klass and Others v. Germany, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: ECtHR) stressed that telephone conversations are protected by the principles of "private life" and "correspondence" as defined by Article 8. It was repeated in Malone v. The United Kingdom and countless other decisions (Turanjanin, 2022).…”
Section: Special Investigative Measures In the Light Of The Case Law ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the well-known case Klass and Others v. Germany, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: ECtHR) stressed that telephone conversations are protected by the principles of "private life" and "correspondence" as defined by Article 8. It was repeated in Malone v. The United Kingdom and countless other decisions (Turanjanin, 2022).…”
Section: Special Investigative Measures In the Light Of The Case Law ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The national law regulates the admissibility of evidence, so, the national courts have to assess the evidence before them (Turanjanin, 2020). The ECtHR, however, must ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (Turanjanin, 2022; see also Čvorović, 2016, pp. 43-53).…”
Section: Special Investigative Measures In the Light Of The Case Law ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation