Handbook of Geomathematics 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01546-5_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special Functions in Mathematical Geosciences: An Attempt at a Categorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of the symbolsˆĴ .n/ for different scales J represents the trade-off between spatial and frequency localization (see illustration below). For a more precise quantitative categorization in terms of the uncertainty principle, the reader is referred to Freeden (1998) and the contribution Freeden and Schreiner (2010a) …”
Section: Wavelets As Frequency Packagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of the symbolsˆĴ .n/ for different scales J represents the trade-off between spatial and frequency localization (see illustration below). For a more precise quantitative categorization in terms of the uncertainty principle, the reader is referred to Freeden (1998) and the contribution Freeden and Schreiner (2010a) …”
Section: Wavelets As Frequency Packagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…geographical, domain, where they are either optimally concentrated or within which they are exactly limited, and which at the same time are exactly confined within a certain bandwidth, or maximally concentrated therein. The measure of concentration is invariably a quadratic energy ratio, which, though only one choice out of many (Donoho & Stark 1989;Freeden & Windheuser 1997;Riedel & Sidorenko 1995;Freeden & Schreiner 2010;Michel 2010) is perfectly suited to the nature of the problems we are attempting to address. These are, for example: How do we make estimates of signals that are noisily and incompletely observed?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%