2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2003.10.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special attention network

Abstract: In this Note a social network model for opinion formation is proposed in which a person connected to q partners pays an attention 1/q to each partner. The mutual attention between two connected persons i and j is taken equal to the geometric mean 1/ √ q i q j . Opinion is represented as usual by an Ising spin s = ±1 and mutual attention is given through a two-spin coupling J ij = JQ/ √ q i q j , Q being the average connectivity in the network. Connectivity diminishes attention and only persons with low connect… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
23
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
23
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Sumour and Shabat [5,6] investigated Ising models with spin S = 1/2 on directed BA networks [4] with the usual Glauber dynamics. No spontaneous magnetisation was found, in contrast to the case of undirected BA networks [7,8,9] where a spontaneous magnetisation was found below a critical temperature which increases logarithmically with system size. In S = 1/2 systems on undirected, scale-free hierarchical-lattice small-world networks [10], conventional and algebraic (Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless) ordering, with finite transition temperatures, have been found.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Sumour and Shabat [5,6] investigated Ising models with spin S = 1/2 on directed BA networks [4] with the usual Glauber dynamics. No spontaneous magnetisation was found, in contrast to the case of undirected BA networks [7,8,9] where a spontaneous magnetisation was found below a critical temperature which increases logarithmically with system size. In S = 1/2 systems on undirected, scale-free hierarchical-lattice small-world networks [10], conventional and algebraic (Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless) ordering, with finite transition temperatures, have been found.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Sumour and Shabat [7,8] investigated Ising models on directed Barabási-Albert networks [9] with the usual Glauber dynamics. No spontaneous magnetisation was found, in contrast to the case of undirected Barabási-Albert networks [10,11,12] where a spontaneous magnetisation was found lower a critical temperature which increases logarithmically with system size. More recently, Lima and Stauffer [13] simulated directed square, cubic and hypercubic lattices in two to five dimensions with heat bath dynamics in order to separate the network effects from the effects of directedness.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…No spontaneous magnetisation was found, in contrast to the case of undirected Barabási-Albert networks [4,5,6] where a spontaneous magnetisation was found lower a critical temperature which increases logarithmically with system size. Lima and Stauffer [7] simulated directed square, cubic and hypercubic lattices in two to five dimensions with heat bath dynamics in order to separate the network effects form the effects of directedness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%