Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat02802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spearman Correlation Coefficients, Differences between

Abstract: Testing the equality of two population correlation coefficients when the data are bivariate normal and Pearson correlation coefficients are used as estimates of the population parameters is a straightforward procedure covered in many introductory statistics courses. The coefficients are converted using Fisher's z ‐transformation with standard errors ( N  − 3) −1/2 . The two transformed values are then compared using a standard normal proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the associations between variables. 21 The number of PHR logins was added to those variables to predict medication Table 3 reports on the sociodemographics of the study participants. The groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the associations between variables. 21 The number of PHR logins was added to those variables to predict medication Table 3 reports on the sociodemographics of the study participants. The groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A non-parametric test for correlation was used, since the variables except nucleus accumbens volumes, were not normally distributed in at least one group. Statistical differences between the within-group correlation coefficients obtained in the PCP and HC groups, respectively, were tested with Fisher's r-to-z transformation (Myers and Sirois, 2006). Exact p-values are reported, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistical significant.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, interactions between signaling pathways were constructed. In order to describe the strengths of signaling pathway interactions, the SCC method (14) was utilized to rank pairwise interactions between the CSVD samples and normal controls. The SCC absolute difference value of a pathway interaction between CSVD and normal samples was defined as the weight value of this pathway interaction.…”
Section: Genementioning
confidence: 99%