Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 2005
DOI: 10.1002/0471667196.ess5050.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spearman Correlation Coefficients, Differences between

Abstract: Testing the equality of two population correlation coefficients when the data are bivariate normal and Pearson correlation coefficients are used as estimates of the population parameters is a straightforward procedure covered in many introductory statistics courses. The coefficients are converted using Fisher's z ‐transformation with standard errors ( N  − 3) −1/2 . The two transformed values are then compared using a standard normal proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also report 95% bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) confidence intervals (CIs) based on 2000 bootstrap samples for main correlation analyses. We compared the magnitude of correlations between Control and SMART groups [35], after converting Spearman’s correlation coefficients to Pearson’s correlation coefficients using the formula described by Myers and Sirois [36]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also report 95% bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) confidence intervals (CIs) based on 2000 bootstrap samples for main correlation analyses. We compared the magnitude of correlations between Control and SMART groups [35], after converting Spearman’s correlation coefficients to Pearson’s correlation coefficients using the formula described by Myers and Sirois [36]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation in the adjunct condition for the group with DLI was also significantly larger than for the group with typical language. Following Myers and Sirois (2006), we first calculated Pearson correlation coefficients ( r = −.23 (DLI), r = −.07 (TL)) and then used these to compute a directional test based on the z statistic, a Fisher z transformation ( z = 1.91 (one-tailed), p = .03). In the noun argument condition, there was a significant positive correlation in the group with typical language, and no significant correlation in the group with DLI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to gain a deeper understanding of how subjective ratings of perceived well-being, exertion, and pain severity are influenced by the skiing intervention, Spearman's correlations were calculated for IG under all three conditions separately. In a second step, differences between corresponding correlation coefficients under different conditions (e.g., rho coefficient between exertion and well-being during skiing days compared with rho coefficient between exertion and well-being during non-skiing days in skiing season) were proved for statistical significance (Myers & Sirois, 2004).…”
Section: Diurnal Variations Of Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study conducted by Pua et al (2013) reveals that fear-induced limitation of activities is also very common in older patients with TKA. Besides these pros and cons of physical activity in the elderly, the American College of Sports Medicine (Nelson et al, 2007) addresses areas of emphasis in promoting physical activity in elderly people. They point out that reducing sedentary behavior should be done using a gradual or stepwise approach by increasing moderate activity (30-60 min/day) and giving less attention to high-impact training.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%