Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1998.674378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaker verification using minimum verification error training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum verification error (MVE) training method [6] is modified to fit our requirement that only mis-verified training samples should be considered. We call it the minimum verification squared-error (MVSE) adaptation strategy.…”
Section: Minimum Verification Squared-error (Mvse) Adaptation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimum verification error (MVE) training method [6] is modified to fit our requirement that only mis-verified training samples should be considered. We call it the minimum verification squared-error (MVSE) adaptation strategy.…”
Section: Minimum Verification Squared-error (Mvse) Adaptation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several discriminative training methods [4], such as the minimum classification error (MCE) training method [5], the minimum verification error (MVE) training method [6], and the maximum mutual information (MMI) training method [7], have been proposed, they tend to over-train a model if the amount of training data is insufficient. In contrast, the DFA framework is based on the minimum verification squared-error (MVSE) adaptation strategy, which is modified from the MVE training method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain an optimal set of weights, we propose using Minimum Verification Error (MVE) training [6,7].…”
Section: Minimum Verification Error Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the geometric mean L 3 (U) or the arithmetic mean L 1 (U), which are independent of the system training, our combination scheme treats the background models unequally according to how close each individual is to the hypothesized speaker model, and quantifies the unequal nature of the background models by a set of weights optimized in the training phase. The optimization is carried out by Minimum Verification Error (MVE) training [6,7], which minimizes both the false acceptance probability and the false rejection probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] proposed the use of general Gaussian mixture models which offer improved speech modeling resulting in better verification accuracy; Ref. [5] reported significant performance improvement using minimum verification error training; and Li et al in [6] proposed the method of utterance verification embedded in a human-machine dialog which can be used for both automatic registration and speaker verification. In this work, we focus on the issue of speech coding and its impact on the performance of a speaker verification system due to the fact that nearly all telecommunication networks today are digital and thus speech signals that are being transmitted through the networks are all encoded into bit-streams at various bit rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%