2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporally interactive growth dynamics in selected South African forests: Edaphoclimatic environment, crowding and climate effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4) display distinct differences in their reactions to competition (Seifert et al 2014). Growth is strongly influenced by light availability for canopy species in the lower canopy and subcanopy levels, while trees at the canopy level of inherently faster growing species usually reach larger sizes and are more responsive to light, with slower growing species occurring below faster growing species and vice versa (Seydack et al 2011). The growth of subcanopy trees of canopy species is also constrained by the proximity of adult trees of the same species, particularly for the two dominant canopy species, viz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) display distinct differences in their reactions to competition (Seifert et al 2014). Growth is strongly influenced by light availability for canopy species in the lower canopy and subcanopy levels, while trees at the canopy level of inherently faster growing species usually reach larger sizes and are more responsive to light, with slower growing species occurring below faster growing species and vice versa (Seydack et al 2011). The growth of subcanopy trees of canopy species is also constrained by the proximity of adult trees of the same species, particularly for the two dominant canopy species, viz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These matrix invading canopy species are often considered to be gap opportunists and are geared to occupy upper canopy positions. Physiologically, forest matrix occupants are persistence specialists (stress resistance) under the resource-responsive metabolic performance mode, underpinning persistance capacity and niche specialisation under tropical conditions (Seydack 2000;Seydack et al 2011Seydack et al , 2012.…”
Section: Structure and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversity does not only refer to species richness, but to a range of phenomena that determine the heterogeneity within a community, including the diversity of tree sizes and spatial patterns. In general, studies on complex multi-species and highly structured forest ecosystems, such as the Knysna-Amatole forests are relatively scarce (Midgley et al 2002, Midgley & Seydack 2006, Seydack et al 2011. Structure and species diversity are important characteristics of a forest community and a comprehensive description regarding these attributes of the unique Knysna forests is still incomplete.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El anterior es uno de los factores indispensables para la construcción de un modelo de crecimiento de árbol individual, especialmente, si se trata de especies en bosques mixtos e irregulares (Schröder y Gadow, 1999). Sin embargo, ese tipo de estudios se han realizado, sobre todo, en plantaciones de una sola especie, por lo que los relativos a bosques irregulares con más de un taxon son todavía muy escasos (Moravie et al, 1999;Coates et al, 2009;Seydack et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified