2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal variations of total and dissolved trace elements and their distributions amongst major colloidal forms along and across the lower Athabasca River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar concentrations were found in the autumn of 2015 when water samples were collected in duplicate at 19 stations. 82 When water samples were collected at various locations and depths from the main stem of the river in the autumn of 2017 (n ¼ 51) and the spring of 2018 (n ¼ 39), 91 remarkably similar concentrations for Cd, Pb, Sb and Tl were obtained for the dissolved fraction (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Williammentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar concentrations were found in the autumn of 2015 when water samples were collected in duplicate at 19 stations. 82 When water samples were collected at various locations and depths from the main stem of the river in the autumn of 2017 (n ¼ 51) and the spring of 2018 (n ¼ 39), 91 remarkably similar concentrations for Cd, Pb, Sb and Tl were obtained for the dissolved fraction (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Williammentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, this is not simply an issue of inadequate LODs. In fact, as noted earlier, the TEs of concern are found at extremely low concentrations in the dissolved fraction of the AR, 81,82,[91][92][93]121 and present a challenge for most laboratories, especially for the ones providing routine analyses.…”
Section: Watermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Samples were selected from a larger sampling campaign undertaken in Spring 2018, focusing on spatial variation in the AR and its tributaries ( Figure 1 ). 29 Selection targeted the range of spatial, source-based, and hydrological differences, including DOM- and Fe-rich tributaries (Clearwater R., CW; Horse R., HR; Steepbank R, SB), a transect of surface samples on the east, middle, and west sides of the AR (ARSE, ARSM, and ARSW), and samples collected under high, medium, and base flow conditions following a storm event (HR hiQ and HR, and ARSW hiQ, midQ and lowQ). Satellite coordinates and basic water quality parameters are provided in Supporting Information Table S3.…”
Section: Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a plausible mechanism linking emissions from industrial facilities and effects on stream biota, the parsing of metrics such as precipitation to 'natural' or 'anthropogenic' causes is not clear. For example, while CoCs deposited on the landscape may migrate to surface water bodies, greater flows in rivers may also increase the natural scouring of the substrate [14,[88][89][90][91][92], and, similar to potential interactions of some anthropogenic activities and AT mentioned already, the co-occurrence of drivers may obscure, mask, or counteract some industrial influences [14,88,89,91]. However, the results in this study also suggest that inputs of industrial CoCs in the spring, while they may be difficult to detect, may be more apparent at sites higher in watersheds.…”
Section: Influence Of 'Mixture' Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%