2022
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.960634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal Variations of Human Pressure on Key Biodiversity Areas in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract: A key biodiversity area (KBA) is one of the important emerging area-based conservation measures that is being implemented recently in China; however, the human pressure faced by a KBA is still unclear. This study analyzed the spatiotemporal variation of human pressure on KBAs from 1990 to 2017 and compared it with the human pressure on national natural reserves (NNRs) through a case study of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. In addition, changes in the trend of human pressure before and after 2010 were analyzed to ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HAI constructed in this research largely follows the evaluation index systems established by previous studies, encompassing population density, GDP, nighttime light, land cover, and road networks (Huang et al., 2022; Mu et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2016). However, given that grasslands occupy over 60% of the QTP (Li et al., 2019; Zeng et al., 2022), we employed grazing intensity (i.e., the number of grazing livestock per square kilometer) in lieu of previously used pasture area to improve the accuracy of quantifying human activities in grassland ecosystems. Additionally, unlike previous studies that typically assigned equal weights to all indicators, we adopted a different approach based on expert judgment.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HAI constructed in this research largely follows the evaluation index systems established by previous studies, encompassing population density, GDP, nighttime light, land cover, and road networks (Huang et al., 2022; Mu et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2016). However, given that grasslands occupy over 60% of the QTP (Li et al., 2019; Zeng et al., 2022), we employed grazing intensity (i.e., the number of grazing livestock per square kilometer) in lieu of previously used pasture area to improve the accuracy of quantifying human activities in grassland ecosystems. Additionally, unlike previous studies that typically assigned equal weights to all indicators, we adopted a different approach based on expert judgment.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Description, Source, and Processing Method of Eco-Environmental Indicators et al, 2019;Zeng et al, 2022…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areas with population densities surpassing 10 persons/hm 2 were assigned a pressure score of 10, while areas with densities below 10 persons/hm 2 were assigned scores on a logarithmic scale ranging from 0 to 10, following a mathematical equation (Zeng et al, 2022).…”
Section: Population Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to previous HFP maps, these HFP maps significantly improved those underestimated regions and can reveal continuous changes in the HFP record. This dataset has been applied to studies on biodiversity and habitat quality (Gao et al, 2022; Zeng et al, 2022). The HFP index can be used as a multifactor composite indicator of anthropogenic drivers of AGBC loss, however, the spatiotemporal variation of AGBC loss due to increased HFP has not been thoroughly studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%