2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-019-02217-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal Variation in the Continental US Streamflow in Association with Large-Scale Climate Signals Across Multiple Spectral Bands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this scale, the 10° (45°) difference indicated that the influence of PRP on streamflows was recorded with 1-3 (3-12) month lags, whereas 0° indicated that both time series were simultaneously related. On the 10-14 (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) year decadal scale, the indices presented −45° (0° and 10°) phase difference, which implies that the influence of PRP on streamflows of ARB (PRB) was reflected within a 15-21 (3-5) month time interval. The CJ index and PC1 for ARB showed coherences on the 2-7-year interannual scale from 1988 to 2013 (Figure 10b), with phase differences from 0 to −45°, meaning a delay of approximately 3-11 months.…”
Section: Wavelet Coherence and Phase Differencementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this scale, the 10° (45°) difference indicated that the influence of PRP on streamflows was recorded with 1-3 (3-12) month lags, whereas 0° indicated that both time series were simultaneously related. On the 10-14 (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) year decadal scale, the indices presented −45° (0° and 10°) phase difference, which implies that the influence of PRP on streamflows of ARB (PRB) was reflected within a 15-21 (3-5) month time interval. The CJ index and PC1 for ARB showed coherences on the 2-7-year interannual scale from 1988 to 2013 (Figure 10b), with phase differences from 0 to −45°, meaning a delay of approximately 3-11 months.…”
Section: Wavelet Coherence and Phase Differencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The coherence between the PC1 for ARB (PRB) and PRP was significant on the 2-8-year time scale from 1985 to 2011 with a phase difference from 0 • to 10 • (0 • to 45 • ) (Figure 10a,c). For this scale, the 10 • (45 • ) difference indicated that the influence of PRP on streamflows was recorded with 1-3 (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) month lags, whereas 0 • indicated that both time series were simultaneously related. On the 10-14 (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) year decadal scale, the indices presented −45 • (0 • and 10 • ) phase difference, which implies that the influence of PRP on streamflows of ARB (PRB) was reflected within a 15-21 (3-5) month time interval.…”
Section: Wavelet Coherence and Phase Differencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…GCMs have known uncertainties and statistical biases that limit their direct use for hydrological assessments especially at short time scales, such as daily to weekly [58][59][60]. To tackle the issue of statistical biases, several correction techniques have been developed to adjust modelled variables to observations [61].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainties and irregularities in the hydrological cycle create a gap in the net water availability by reducing the supply [8] and increasing the demand [9][10][11][12]. Furthermore, the hydrological process disruptions, as a consequence of climate change and variability, have resulted in severe streamflow fluctuation [13,14]. Change in land use and land cover, coupled with the population growth, has significantly challenged water management in urban watersheds [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%