Spatiotemporal variation in global floods with different affected areas and the contribution of influencing factors to flood-induced mortality (1985–2019)

Abstract

Floods are great threats to human life and property. Extensive research has investigated the spatiotemporal variation in flood occurrence, while few have studied the heterogeneity in global flood events of different sizes, which may require different coping strategies and risk reduction policies. In this study, we analysed the spatiotemporal patterns of global flood events with different affected areas (classified in three levels) during 1985–2019 and examined the contribution of different influencing factors to flood-induced mortality using Geodetector. The results show that (1) the increase in global flood frequency was mainly caused by Level II and Level III floods, and the average area affected by flood events has been increasing yearly since 1985. (2) In America and Africa, the frequency of Level III floods has increased monotonically. At the same time, the frequency of Level I floods in Europe and Level II floods in Asia has increased significantly. (3) For Europe and Asia, most of the deaths occurred with Level II floods; while for America and Africa, Level III floods caused the most mortality. (4) The top three factors contributing to the spatial heterogeneity in flood-induced mortality were the affected population, GDP per capita and flood duration. The contribution of each factor varied among the different types of floods. Topographic factors (percentage of mountainous area) magnified flood-induced mortality during extreme events with heavy rainfall, especially for Level III floods. The heterogeneity in flood frequency and flood-induced mortality indicates that flood protection measures should be more targeted. In addition, the increase in large-scale floods (Level III) highlights the need for transregional cooperation in flood risk management.

Flood vulnerability of a few areas in the foothills of the Western Ghats: a comparison of AHP and F-AHP models

“…Alike the rest of the world, flooding is one of the most prevalent natural hazards in India. India is one of the top ten countries (ranks third) most frequently affected by flooding (Liu et al 2022 ). But what makes it different from the rest is the very high population density.…”

Assessing Disaster Management Infrastructure and Strategies in South Eastern Nigeria

“…According to [6,8,9], landslides, windstorms, earthquakes, drought, floods, and other natural disasters may endanger lives, property, and productive assets and influence social indicators, destabilising the average stability of an area. Flood mortality in Europe averaged fewer than 250 per year throughout the 21st century, and between 1970 and 2006, the yearly flood damage in Europe had engulfed $3.8 billion [5,11,12]. Devastating floods, driven mainly by heavy rain, afflicted much of Europe in the first decade of the twenty-first century.…”

“…The August 2002 overflow devastated five major countries (Germany, Czech Republic, Austria, Romania, and Hungary), resulting in about 55 fatalities and $20 billion in material damage. After that, another severe flood in France killed almost 23 people and cost approximately $1.2 billion in property damage [9,11,12].…”

“…In furtherance of the above, emergent behaviour, which occurs when individuals recognise needs that are not being addressed and thus seek to meet them informally, is a critical component in disaster response [1,19,34]. Disaster demands outstrip the capabilities of people working individually, resulting in uncoordinated responses and the refusal of autonomous units to remove fragmentation, gaps in service delivery, and unneeded duplication of services [12,19,20]. People strive to assist themselves since the infrastructure supplied by the government is no longer enough to serve their needs.…”

“…For instance, since Haiti's devastated areas had little or no infrastructure, the number of fatalities and property losses surged considerably during the earthquake. The devastated infrastructure hampered the relief efforts of emergency-related organisations by delaying their arrival in Haiti's impacted districts [5,9,12,19]. Damage and repercussions from the earthquake may have been considerably avoided if they had identified and strengthened the critical infrastructure (the communication networks and main roadways) prone to earthquakes ahead of schedule.…”