2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal variation in flow-dependent recruitment of long-lived riverine fish: Model development and evaluation

Abstract: Goto, Daisuke; Hamel, Martin J.; Hammen, Jeremy J.; Rugg, Mathew L.; Pegg, Mark A.; and Forbes, Valery E., "Spatiotemporal variation in flow-dependent recruitment of long-lived riverine fish: Model development and evaluation" (2014). Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences. 369.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fragmentation has contributed to local extirpation of sturgeon in numerous rivers (Bemis & Findeis 1994, Ferguson & Duckworth 1997, Hensel & Holcik 1997. Dams act as barriers to upstream move ment to historic spawning areas (Bir stein 1993, DeVore et al 1995, Wei et al 1997, congregating migrating sturgeon and exposing them to harvest and the perils of poaching (Cohen 1997, Fernández-Pasquier 1999, and altering flows, affecting the success of natural sturgeon recruitment within rivers (Khoroshko 1972, Ivanov et al 1999, Jager et al 2002, Goto et al 2015, Haxton et al 2015. Moreover, variation in sturgeon abundance across the landscape has been attributed to the presence of hydroelectric generating stations (DeVore et al 1995, Haxton & Findlay 2008, Haxton et al 2014, demonstrating that dams can play a significant role in limiting the recovery processes for sturgeon.…”
Section: Recent Improvements and Continued Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragmentation has contributed to local extirpation of sturgeon in numerous rivers (Bemis & Findeis 1994, Ferguson & Duckworth 1997, Hensel & Holcik 1997. Dams act as barriers to upstream move ment to historic spawning areas (Bir stein 1993, DeVore et al 1995, Wei et al 1997, congregating migrating sturgeon and exposing them to harvest and the perils of poaching (Cohen 1997, Fernández-Pasquier 1999, and altering flows, affecting the success of natural sturgeon recruitment within rivers (Khoroshko 1972, Ivanov et al 1999, Jager et al 2002, Goto et al 2015, Haxton et al 2015. Moreover, variation in sturgeon abundance across the landscape has been attributed to the presence of hydroelectric generating stations (DeVore et al 1995, Haxton & Findlay 2008, Haxton et al 2014, demonstrating that dams can play a significant role in limiting the recovery processes for sturgeon.…”
Section: Recent Improvements and Continued Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to find models that use different techniques, such as diffuse, multivariate and fuzzy logic approaches, and that allow the inclusion of the interaction between ecological variables (BOAVIDA et al, 2014;BENJANKAR et al, 2012;DARAIO et al, 2010;SILVA, 2010), including water quality parameters, such as temperatures, dissolved oxygen levels, biochemical oxygen demands and nutrients (SOUZA et al, 2014;MARSILI-LIBELLI et al, 2013;AYLLÓN et al, 2012b), among other potentialities. Such models vary in complexity, from one-dimensional models (GOTO et al, 2015) to those based on two- (YI et al, 2010) or three-dimensional hydraulic equations (DARAIO et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goto et al. () predicted that low‐water periods in rivers could result in a steady population decline and in a slowing of gonadal development. Additionally, Shovelnose Sturgeon will experience mortality during low‐water conditions when temperatures exceed 28°C (Hupfeld et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not much is known about the resilience of Shovelnose Sturgeon during low‐ and high‐water fluctuations, but recent evidence has suggested that the flow dynamics of a river could influence the overall population characteristics of Shovelnose Sturgeon, resulting in low recruitment, high mortality, and slow growth (Goto et al. ; Hupfeld et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%