Spatiotemporal variability of hyporheic exchange through a pool‐riffle‐pool sequence

Gariglio, Frank; Tonina, Daniele; Luce, Charles H.

doi:10.1002/wrcr.20419

Cited by 65 publications

(79 citation statements)

References 73 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Due to the longitudinal water head decrease along the flow, pool and riffle sequences are submitted, from upstream to downstream, to a head gradient, which involves water downwelling upstream riffles and water upwelling at the riffle tail (Crispell and Endreny, 2009;Frei et al, 2010;Gooseff et al, 2006;Harvey and Bencala, 1993;Gariglio et al, 2013;Kasahara and Hill, 2006;Maier and Howard, 2011;Marzadri et al, 2011;Saenger et al, 2005;Tonina and Buffington, 2007). Due to the sequence, stream-aquifer exchanges seem to increase with the amplitude of the streambed oscillations, until a threshold is reached (Trauth et al, 2013).…”

Section: Morphological Shaping Related To the Hydro-sedimentary Rivermentioning

confidence: 99%

Continental hydrosystem modelling: the concept of nested stream–aquifer interfaces

Flipo

Mouhri

Labarthe

et al. 2014

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Coupled hydrological-hydrogeological models, emphasising the importance of the stream-aquifer interface, are more and more used in hydrological sciences for pluridisciplinary studies aiming at investigating environmental issues. Based on an extensive literature review, stream-aquifer interfaces are described at five different scales: local [10 cm- . This led us to develop the concept of nested stream-aquifer interfaces, which extends the well-known vision of nested groundwater pathways towards the surface, where the mixing of low frequency processes and high frequency processes coupled with the complexity of geomorphological features and heterogeneities creates hydrological spiralling. This conceptual framework allows the identification of a hierarchical order of the multi-scale control factors of stream-aquifer hydrological exchanges, from the larger scale to the finer scale. The hyporheic corridor, which couples the river to its 3-D hyporheic zone, is then identified as the key component for scaling hydrological processes occurring at the interface. The identification of the hyporheic corridor as the support of the hydrological processes scaling is an important step for the development of regional studies, which is one of the main concerns for water practitioners and resources managers.In a second part, the modelling of the stream-aquifer interface at various scales is investigated with the help of the conductance model. Although the usage of the temperature as a tracer of the flow is a robust method for the assessment of stream-aquifer exchanges at the local scale, there is a crucial need to develop innovative methodologies for assessing stream-aquifer exchanges at the regional scale. After formulating the conductance model at the regional and intermediate scales, we address this challenging issue with the development of an iterative modelling methodology, which ensures the consistency of stream-aquifer exchanges between the intermediate and regional scales.Finally, practical recommendations are provided for the study of the interface using the innovative methodology MIM (Measurements-Interpolation-Modelling), which is graphically developed, scaling in space the three pools of methods needed to fully understand stream-aquifer interfaces at various scales. In the MIM space, stream-aquifer interfaces that can be studied by a given approach are localised. The efficiency of the method is demonstrated with two examples. The first one proposes an upscaling framework, structured around river reaches of ∼ 10-100 m, from the local to the watershed scale. The second example highlights the usefulness of space borne data to improve the assessment of streamaquifer exchanges at the regional and continental scales. We conclude that further developments in modelling and field measurements have to be undertaken at the regional scale to enable a proper modelling of stream-aquifer exchanges from the local to the continental scale.

show abstract

Section: Morphological Shaping Related To the Hydro-sedimentary Rivermentioning

confidence: 99%

Continental hydrosystem modelling: the concept of nested stream–aquifer interfaces

Flipo

Mouhri

Labarthe

et al. 2014

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sinusoidal oscillations have been observed to approximate the daily variations well for DO [10], temperature [11,12] and BOD [13]. Daily oscillations of DO are due to photosynthesis/respiration plant cycles, those of temperature to the day/night cycle, while BOD variations are chiefly correlated with discharge from wastewater treatment plants.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 84%

Benthic Uptake Rate due to Hyporheic Exchange: The Effects of Streambed Morphology for Constant and Sinusoidally Varying Nutrient Loads

Tonina

Marzadri

Bellin

2015

Water

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hyporheic exchange carries reactive solutes, which may include biological oxygen demand (BOD), dissolved oxygen (DO) and reactive dissolved inorganic nitrogen (Nr), into the sediment, where biochemical reactions consume DO. Here, we study the impact of streambed morphology, stream-reactive solute loads and their diel oscillations on the DO benthic uptake rate (BUR) due to hyporheic processes. Our model solves the hyporheic flow field and the solute transport equations analytically, within a Lagrangian framework, considering advection, longitudinal diffusion and reactions modeled as first order kinetics. The application of the model to DO field measurements over a gravel bar-pool sequence shows a good match with measured DO concentrations with an overall agreement of 58% and a kappa index of 0.46. We apply the model to investigate the effects of daily constant and sinusoidally time varying stream BOD, DO and Nr loads and of the morphodynamic parameters on BUR. Our modeling results show that BUR varies as a function of bedform size and of nutrient loads and that the hyporheic zone may consume up to 0.06% of the stream DO at the pool-riffle bedform scale. Daily oscillations of stream BOD and DO loads have small effects on BUR, but may have an important influence on local hyporheic processes and organisms' distribution. OPEN ACCESSWater 2015, 7 399

show abstract

“…Significant spatial variability of water fluxes may exist at the river-groundwater interface (Binley et al 2013;Gariglio et al 2013); thus, Vogt et al (2010) emphasizes that high-resolution measurements are necessary for detailed assessment of spatial heterogeneity of river groundwater interaction. Although seepage meters, shallow piezometer nests, and temperature sticks are capable of accurately estimating single points in space flux, hundreds of these instruments would have to be deployed throughout the entire stream to be effective.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heat tracing to determine spatial patterns of hyporheic exchange across a river transect

Chen

Zhang

et al. 2017

Hydrogeol J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Significant spatial variability of water fluxes may exist at the water-sediment interface in river channels and has great influence on a variety of water issues. Understanding the complicated flow systems controlling the flux exchanges along an entire river is often limited due to averaging of parameters or the small number of discrete point measurements usually used. This study investigated the spatial pattern of the hyporheic flux exchange across a river transect in China, using the heat tracing approach. This was done with measurements of temperature at high spatial resolution during a 64-h monitoring period and using the data to identify the spatial pattern of the hyporheic exchange flux with the aid of a one-dimensional conduction-advection-dispersion model (VFLUX). The threshold of neutral exchange was considered as 126 L m −2 d −1 in this study and the heat tracing results showed that the change patterns of vertical hyporheic flux varied with buried depth along the river transect; however, the hyporheic flux was not simply controlled by the streambed hydraulic conductivity and water depth in the river transect. Also, lateral flow dominated the hyporheic process within the shallow high-permeability streambed, while the vertical flow was dominant in the deep low-permeability streambed. The spatial pattern of hyporheic exchange across the river transect was naturally controlled by the heterogeneity of the streambed and the bedform of the stream cross-section. Consequently, a two-dimensional conceptual illustration of the hyporheic process across the river transect is proposed, which could be applicable to river transects of similar conditions.

show abstract

Spatiotemporal variability of hyporheic exchange through a pool‐riffle‐pool sequence

Cited by 65 publications

References 73 publications

Continental hydrosystem modelling: the concept of nested stream–aquifer interfaces

Continental hydrosystem modelling: the concept of nested stream–aquifer interfaces

Benthic Uptake Rate due to Hyporheic Exchange: The Effects of Streambed Morphology for Constant and Sinusoidally Varying Nutrient Loads

Heat tracing to determine spatial patterns of hyporheic exchange across a river transect

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About