2021
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2020.3046240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal Trident Networks: Detection and Localization of Object Removal Tampering in Video Passive Forensics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding or removing objects from a certain frame can cause an abrupt change in a video sequence. Because the motion residual can act as a clue in the detection of the object-based frame tampering, it is frequently used in detecting video tampering [17,[23][24][25]. However, a scene change in a video frame can also cause an abrupt change.…”
Section: Motion Residualmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Adding or removing objects from a certain frame can cause an abrupt change in a video sequence. Because the motion residual can act as a clue in the detection of the object-based frame tampering, it is frequently used in detecting video tampering [17,[23][24][25]. However, a scene change in a video frame can also cause an abrupt change.…”
Section: Motion Residualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Table 2, we can see that both the non-forged and tampered-with frames are identified well with an accuracy of 98% or more. We compared our with five state-of-the-art methods by Yao et al [23] (CNN), Kohli et al [24] (Temporal CNN), Aloraini et al [31] (TF-SA), Aloraini et al [21] (S-PA), and Yang et al [25] (STN). Table 3 shows six metrics for six forgery detection algorithms, including the proposed method.…”
Section: Two-class Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations