2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal resolved sampling for the interpretation of micropollutant removal during riverbank filtration

Abstract: Riverbank filtration (RBF) systems along rivers are widely used as public water supplies. In these systems, many organic micropollutants (OMPs) are attenuated, but some compounds have shown to be rather persistent. Their fate and transport has been studied in RBF sites along lakes and small rivers, but not extensively along large and dynamic rivers. Therefore, the influence of flood events on OMP behavior in these large and dynamic RBF sites was investigated. Monthly samples were taken from surface- and ground… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, different degradation behaviour can be seen for individual sites. The percentage of removal of carbamazepine varied between 37.7 and 51.8%, which was relatively persistent during subsurface flow as was observed previously at other sites [4,22,27,28]. Carbamazepine was also detected in well 78b/1s, where the travel time is 5 months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, different degradation behaviour can be seen for individual sites. The percentage of removal of carbamazepine varied between 37.7 and 51.8%, which was relatively persistent during subsurface flow as was observed previously at other sites [4,22,27,28]. Carbamazepine was also detected in well 78b/1s, where the travel time is 5 months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The research presented confirms high percentages of removal for organic micropollutants at the RBF sites [2,7,8,19,22,[27][28][29][30]. Among 25 substances measured in the Warta River, 12 were not detected in the RBF site in Krajkowo (valsartan, fexofenadine, clindamycin, saccharin, iopromide, diclofenac, cotinine, iohexol, metoprolol, penicillin G, iomeprol and venlafaxine).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…It is better to design a smaller value to the distance between well and river, only if the water quantity is considered in the engineering. However, it is not favorable for the effectiveness of the RBF as a pre-treatment measure of water [47]. Furthermore, it is also not favorable for protecting the wells from possible river flooding and water pollution, which will pose significant impact on the safety of the social water supply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBF performance for OMP removal and degradation is dependent on a variety of factors, such as redox conditions, travel time and distance, hydraulic conductivity, or initial OMP concentration [22][23][24][25]. Although the behavior during RBF is well studied for many compounds, e.g., commonly used pesticides [26,27] and pharmaceuticals [28,29], various TP still lack data on the removal during RBF and suitable removal conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%