2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-019-00817-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal patterns of cheatgrass invasion in Colorado Plateau National Parks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Bishop et al. ) from fall until spring depending on weather patterns (Mack , Meyer et al. ) and has successfully invaded over 210,000 km 2 of the Great Basin in the western United States (Bradley et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Bishop et al. ) from fall until spring depending on weather patterns (Mack , Meyer et al. ) and has successfully invaded over 210,000 km 2 of the Great Basin in the western United States (Bradley et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…topographic gradients, resistance to cheatgrass invasion was driven by temperature and ppt regimes (Chambers et al 2014), and the driver of variable interannual cheatgrass growth was highly variable ppt (Bradley and Mustard 2005). Periods of limited soil moisture reduced plant germination and establishment (Bishop et al 2019), and management activities that sought to exclude nonnative species introduced gaps in vegetation cover that caused increases in resource availability (Rau et al 2014). Both phenomena created space for cheatgrass, an early-season and fast-growing plant, to have invaded by capitalizing on available moisture and nutrients when temperatures warmed, earlier than most native plants (Boyte et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing approaches to mapping cheatgrass distribution, percent cover, and dynamics (e.g., die-off, potential habitat, phenological metrics) generally fall into three categories: those focusing on spectral signatures or phenological indicators in overhead imagery [10,12,13,[16][17][18][19][20][21]; those based on modeling the ecological niche of cheatgrass using known ranges of biophysical conditions of where cheatgrass is known to occur [22,23]; and those combining elements of those two approaches [7,8,11,15,24,25]. Much attention has been given to deriving phenological indicators of cheatgrass presence from spectral indices, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), because its life cycle differs from many of the native plant species in its North American range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%