Spatiotemporal Pattern of Social Vulnerability in Italy

Abstract

Evaluation of social vulnerability (SV) against natural hazards remains a big challenge for disaster risk reduction. Spatiotemporal analysis of SV is important for successful implementation of prevision and prevention measures for risk mitigation. This study examined the spatiotemporal pattern of SV in Italy, and also analyzed socioeconomic factors that may influence how the Italian population reacts to catastrophic natural events. We identified 16 indicators that quantify SV and collected data for the census years 1991, 2001, and 2011. We created a social vulnerability index (SVI) for each year by using principal component analysis outputs and an additive method. Exploratory spatial data analysis, including global and local autocorrelations, was used to understand the spatial patterns of social vulnerability across the country. Specifically, univariate local Moran's index was performed for the SVI of each of the three most recent census years in order to detect changes in spatial clustering during the whole study period. The original contribution of this Italy case study was to use a bivariate spatial correlation to describe the spatiotemporal correlation between the threes annual SV indices. The temporal analysis shows that the percentage of municipalities with medium social vulnerability in Italy increased from 1991 to 2011 and those with very high social vulnerability decreased. Spatial analysis provided evidence of clusters that maintained significant high values of social vulnerability throughout the study periods. The SVI of many areas in the center and the south of the peninsula remained stable, and the people living there have continued to be potentially vulnerable to natural hazards.

Assessing Chinese flood protection and its social divergence

“…A positive value for the local Moran's I statistic indicates that FPL in a county is similar to those in its neighboring counties, while a negative I value indicates dissimilar values (Zhu et al, 2018;Frigerio et al, 2018;Shen et al, 2019). The local Moran's I is calculated by applying the Queen Contiguity matrix in software GeoDa (version 1.12), which is available from http://geodacenter.github.io.…”

Examining Social Vulnerability and Inequality: A Joint Analysis through a Connectivity Lens in the Urban Agglomerations of China

“…Most social vulnerability assessments investigate collective vulnerability with top-down approaches, for example, an indicator-based approach. This approach develops a composite index of social vulnerability based on related indicators and has become prominent in social vulnerability research [16]. Many researchers have exploited the indicator-based approach in various contexts.…”

Natural Hazards and Social Vulnerability of Place: The Strength-Based Approach Applied to Wollongong, Australia

“…Examples of these techniques include topological/connectivity analysis of infrastructure networks based on graph theory (Holmgren 2006;Eusgeld et al 2009;Buldyrev et al 2010;Ogie, Dunn et al 2017;Ogie et al 2018), input-output models that can reveal cascading vulnerabilities across several sectors of the economy when one or more interdependent infrastructure network is impacted by natural hazards (Haimes et al 2005;Setola et al 2009), and agent-based models that help to simulate the impacts of natural hazards on people, assets, and the economy (Schoenwald et al 2004;Ehlen and Scholand 2005). There are other methodologies that directly focus on people and help to reveal what is known as social vulnerability (Cutter and Finch 2008;de Loyola Hummell et al 2016;Sun et al 2017;Frigerio et al 2018;Aksha et al 2019).…”