2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal land use random forest model for estimating metropolitan NO2 exposure in Japan

Abstract: Adequate spatial and temporal estimates of NO concentrations are essential for proper prenatal exposure assessment. Here, we develop a spatiotemporal land use random forest (LURF) model of the monthly mean NO over four years in a metropolitan area of Japan. The overall objective is to obtain accurate NO estimates for use in prenatal exposure assessments. We use random forests to convey the non-linear relationship between NO concentrations and predictor variables, and compare the prediction accuracy with that o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Land-cover terms are proxies for traffic emissions and related to NO 2 concentrations indirectly. A typical NO 2 model is based on a land-cover regression with such quantities as road length, population density, tree canopy coverage, impervious surface, elevation, distance to coast, 12 traffic flow, 13 traffic intensity, 14 land-cover type, 13,15,16 road types, 17 building density, 18 and urban density, 19 as predictor variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land-cover terms are proxies for traffic emissions and related to NO 2 concentrations indirectly. A typical NO 2 model is based on a land-cover regression with such quantities as road length, population density, tree canopy coverage, impervious surface, elevation, distance to coast, 12 traffic flow, 13 traffic intensity, 14 land-cover type, 13,15,16 road types, 17 building density, 18 and urban density, 19 as predictor variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF models have successfully been used in previous studies aiming to predict NO2 concentrations using land use (Araki et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2019;Hu et al, 2017;Zhan et al, 2018). This approach was chosen to minimise the risk of overfitting given that there are relatively few monitoring sites and also to capture non-linear relationships observed between air pollutant concentrations and predictor variables (Araki et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2019;Vizcaino and Lavalle, 2018). RF models are bagged decision tree models, where each tree consists of a random subset of predictor variables from the training dataset and where the final output is the average of multiple decision trees (Breiman, 2001;Grange et al, 2018;Vizcaino and Lavalle, 2018).…”
Section: Model Building and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Araki et al [57] also build a spatiotemporal model based on land use to capture interactions and non-linear relationships between pollutants and land. The study consists of comparing two algorithms-Land Use Random Forest (LURF) vs. Land Use Regression (LUR)-to estimate the concentration levels of NO 2 .…”
Section: Category 3: Considering Land Use and Spatial Heterogeneity/dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brokamp et al [31] perform a deeper analysis based on a prediction of the concertation of the chemical composition of PM 2.5 . As Beckerman et al [57], they compare the performance of a LURF versus LUR approach. The dataset is built from the measurements of 24 monitoring stations in the city of Cincinnati (USA) during the period 2001-2005.…”
Section: Category 3: Considering Land Use and Spatial Heterogeneity/dmentioning
confidence: 99%