Spatiotemporal (In)justice in Digital Platforms: An Analysis of Food-Delivery Platforms in South India

Abstract

With on-demand labour and location-based services becoming increasingly common, this paper explores the complex social justice impact of spatial and temporal elements of digital platforms. A conceptual framing of 'spatiotemporal justice' is proposed to explore the consequences of algorithmic control of space and time experienced by workers. An interpretive case-study is built focusing on work practices of food-delivery platforms in the south Indian city of Chennai. The qualitative methods used include semi-structured interviews of fooddelivery workers and an autoethnographic study by the author as a worker on digital platforms. The empirical analysis demonstrates that (in)justice is involved with the workers' negotiation of multiple micro-spatiotemporalities in their daily work practice. The impacts include workers being forced to balance spatiotemporal risk and stress against the benefits of employment. This is contextualised by inequities propagated due to imperfect digital representation of, and the asymmetrical information on spatiality and temporality within the platform. The workers are further affected adversely in their spatiotemporally subordinated power relationship with other groups of digital platform's stakeholders. Spatiotemporal justice as conceptualised here has direct implications in how future of work is defined, governed and how digital platforms are held accountable -particularly in the global South.

Implications of algorithmic management on careers and employment relationships in the gig economy – a developing country perspective

“…The authors propose that in the gig economy, algorithms pose spatiotemporal systems of inequality and neo-liberal precarity. This is consistent with Krishna's (2020) findings that spatiotemporality on digital platforms is intertwined with social justice in three ways: the spatiotemporal trade-offs between risk and stress against the benefits of employment, concerns with imperfect digital representations, and an asymmetry of power and information. These outcomes pose spatiotemporal injustice for platform workers, particularly those in the global South.…”

Socio‐technical issues in the platform‐mediated gig economy: A systematic literature review: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

“…As an increasingly large and diverse population of workers chooses to join the gig economy and build their careers in a digital workplace, it is critical for platforms to create a culture that embraces fairness (C2) (Chibanda et al, 2022; Krishna, 2020). Prior research found that many rideshare drivers suffered from unfair labor practices because they were defined by the platform as independent contractors (Fleitoukh & Toyama, 2020).…”

The impact of digital platforms on traditional market structures

“…The opaque algorithmic governance raises issues about fairness, accountability, and the right of workers to contest decisions that affect their liveli hoods. Research by [41] in the domain of food delivery services in South India revealed the spatial and temporal injustices inherent in digital platforms. These platforms often reinforce existing power dynamics and inequalities, resulting in unequal access to opportunities and resources.…”