2018
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal Expression of GRP78 in the Blood Vessels of Rats Treated With 3-Nitropropionic Acid Correlates With Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption

Abstract: Glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) or BiP, a 78-kDa chaperone protein located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), has recently been reported to be involved in the neuroglial response to ischemia-induced ER stress. The present study was designed to study the expression patterns of this protein and the cell types involved in the induction of GRP78 expression in rats treated with the mitochondrial toxin 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NP). GRP78 immunoreactivity was almost exclusively localized to striatal neurons in sali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we demonstrated that GRP78 expression was increased in two types of retinal glial cells, Müller cells and microglial cells, in a blue LED-induced RD model. These results were consistent with the increase in GRP78 expression in glial cells in response to several types of brain and spinal cord injuries [25,[42][43][44]. Müller cells are the main glial cells in the retina, corresponding to astrocytes in the brain and spinal cord.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study, we demonstrated that GRP78 expression was increased in two types of retinal glial cells, Müller cells and microglial cells, in a blue LED-induced RD model. These results were consistent with the increase in GRP78 expression in glial cells in response to several types of brain and spinal cord injuries [25,[42][43][44]. Müller cells are the main glial cells in the retina, corresponding to astrocytes in the brain and spinal cord.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These Opn -expressing brain macrophages could have been derived either from resident microglia or from infiltrating blood-borne macrophages, as the two are indistinguishable by morphological criteria due to a lack of specific discrimination criteria [4143]. Additionally, blood-brain barrier breakdown in the striatum has been reported in rat models of Huntington’s disease induced by 3-NP [35, 44, 45]. As noted above, some OPN-positive puncta were observed within the cytoplasm of Opn mRNA-expressing brain macrophages, corresponding to the Golgi complex, but most OPN-immunoreactive puncta were not associated with brain macrophages (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mitochondrial toxin, 3-NP, irreversibly inhibits the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex II and impairs mitochondrial energy production [30, 31]. This toxin selectively damages medium-spiny striatal neurons and astrocytes in the well-demarcated lesion core, which triggers astroglial hypertrophy and the resultant astroglial scar formation in the peri-lesional area [16, 3235]. In our previous study using the same model, we showed that the OPN protein is first localized within dendritic mitochondria, and then accumulates on the surface of degenerating dendrites during the first 2 weeks after 3-NP injection [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the pixel resolution limitations, the blurring of the fluorescent signals was a major difficulty in the correlation between LM imaging and EM imaging. FluoroNanogold (FNG) provides a precise correlation of the subcellular target proteins; for example, GRP-78-Bip is localized in the ER membranes in the EM images [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. In addition, CLEM has been performed using consecutive sections of semithin and ultrathin sections, on which immunolabeling and LM observations were performed on the semithin sections and correlative electron microscopy was carried out on the consecutive ultrathin sections, which inevitably made the correlation of both images inaccurate [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, CLEM has been performed using consecutive sections of semithin and ultrathin sections, on which immunolabeling and LM observations were performed on the semithin sections and correlative electron microscopy was carried out on the consecutive ultrathin sections, which inevitably made the correlation of both images inaccurate [ 21 ]. In our protocol, however, we obtained every ultrathin section from the semi-thin-immunolabeled sample; thus, a more precise localization of the target proteins was possible [ 16 , 17 , 20 , 22 ]. Moreover, conventional resin embedding and positive staining using heavy metals after light microscopy provided better image contrast and resolution than when using Tokuyasu’s technique, in which the negative staining obscures the image contrast and the absence of the resin embedding process limits the spatial resolution [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%