2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal dynamics of ultrarelativistic beam-plasma instabilities

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scaling of the magnetic field amplification with the system size for the case of movable ions is also confirmed with three-dimensional (3D) PIC simulations, using the code EPOCH [39] directions. Different from the transverse 2D simulations, the system is initially dominated by the oblique two-stream instability [28,36] (i.e. the coupled two-stream and CFI) in the 3D simulations, as the chevron-shaped pattern imprinted on the beam density profile shown in figure 9(a).…”
Section: Scaling With the System Sizementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The scaling of the magnetic field amplification with the system size for the case of movable ions is also confirmed with three-dimensional (3D) PIC simulations, using the code EPOCH [39] directions. Different from the transverse 2D simulations, the system is initially dominated by the oblique two-stream instability [28,36] (i.e. the coupled two-stream and CFI) in the 3D simulations, as the chevron-shaped pattern imprinted on the beam density profile shown in figure 9(a).…”
Section: Scaling With the System Sizementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Time evolutions of the transverse magnetic field energy E B ⊥ and beam electron energy E be are shown in figure 2 for the two plasma cases. The growth rate of the instability is [12,28,36,37], where β = v be0 /c, α is the beam-to-plasma density ratio, as indicated in figure 2(a). Good agreement is found between the theory and simulation results.…”
Section: Magnetic Field Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What is left to the plasma response is the return current that flows through the beam, and leads to an unstable counterstreaming system of beam and plasma electrons, where any perturbation at the scale of 𝜆 𝑝 can grow exponentially as the beam propagates through the solid. For ultrarelativistic beams such as delivered by FACET-II, two modes of instability are prominent: the oblique two-stream instability (OTSI) [23], which is mainly electrostatic and with a wave vector at an oblique angle with respect to the beam propagation, and the current filamentation instability (CFI), which is mainly magnetic and transverse. This is exemplified in figure 3 showing the FACET-II electron beam after 0.7 mm The simulation was run using the 3D PIC code [24], with a peak beam density 𝑛 𝑏 = 1 × 10 20 cm −3 , a normalized transverse emittance of 3 mm mrad, a bunch length of 1 µm and with periodic boundary conditions in the transverse directions.…”
Section: Near-term Prospect For Beam Solid-plasma Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…propagation through aluminum, as simulated using the 3D PIC code [24]. At the front of the beam (right of figure 3), longitudinal and transverse modulations are clearly observed and correspond to the OTSI instability, which is the fastest mode to grow in the linear phase [23]. In contrast, at the rear of the beam, beam filaments can be identified and attributed to the CFI instability.…”
Section: Near-term Prospect For Beam Solid-plasma Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%