2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01818.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal dynamics of Citrus tristeza virus in Cuba

Abstract: The spatiotemporal dissemination of Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) was evaluated by DASI-ELISA in orange and grapefruit fields of six citrus producing regions in Cuba, and aphid populations were evaluated in two selected areas. The aphid species found in these areas were Toxoptera citricida (the most efficient vector of CTV), T. aurantii and Aphis spiraecola . A logistic model was the most appropriate to explain the temporal increase in the proportion of CTV-infected plants for almost all the fields. Although nea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was not possible to fit any progress model to the CSD incidence data (low R² and existence of residual patterns, data not shown). Conversely, tristeza progress in Cuba was best described by a logistic model for most areas (Batista et al, 2008). Nevertheless, CT progress in two Cuban fields could not be represented by any model ( Figure 1D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It was not possible to fit any progress model to the CSD incidence data (low R² and existence of residual patterns, data not shown). Conversely, tristeza progress in Cuba was best described by a logistic model for most areas (Batista et al, 2008). Nevertheless, CT progress in two Cuban fields could not be represented by any model ( Figure 1D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model with a good R 2 was accepted as appropriate only if its residuals showed no detectable patterns. Results for CT have been described elsewhere (Batista et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations