2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12031133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal Changes in Ecosystem Services along a Urban-Rural-Natural Gradient: A Case Study of Xi’an, China

Abstract: Urban areas are the areas that are most strongly affected by human activities, which presents many challenges to the ecosystem and human well-being. Ecosystem services (ES) are a comprehensive indicator to measure the ecological effects of urbanization. To effectively identify and evaluate the impact of urbanization on ES, the spatial-temporal pattern of ES should be considered. According to the level of urbanization, Xi’an city is divided into four regions: the urban core area, the urban extended area, the ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ESV in the core urban areas was significantly lower than that in the surrounding areas. This result is consistent with that reported by Li et al [62]. On the whole, the low ESV area in Xi'an was continuously increased from 2000 to 2018.…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Changes Of Esv Response To Lulc Changesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The ESV in the core urban areas was significantly lower than that in the surrounding areas. This result is consistent with that reported by Li et al [62]. On the whole, the low ESV area in Xi'an was continuously increased from 2000 to 2018.…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Changes Of Esv Response To Lulc Changesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Based on GIS, a commonly used ES mapping method, two new methods, place-based mapping (PPGIS) and participatory mapping of ecosystem services (PGIS), were developed [36]. Subsequently, GIS was applied as a coupled study with ecosystem assessment models such as InVEST [37,38], Ca-Markov [39][40][41], CLUE-S [42,43], cellular automata (CA) [44], etc., to study and map urban-rural ES trade-offs. Now that various indicators are applied in studies, problems such as poor comparability, low accuracy, and the incomplete single-indicator system still need improvement [45,46].…”
Section: Urbanizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areas of greatest importance for nature-based solutions will be places that have (1) a high density of people using services combined with (2) a supply of ecosystem services that are sensitive to changes in land cover. In practice, however, fine-scale biophysical and socio-economic heterogeneity in urban landscapes make mapping and assessing the equitable distribution of services under alternate scenarios a more challenging endeavor than it is in more expansive, "simpler" rural landscapes (Li et al, 2020;Lonsdorf et al, 2021;Steele & Wolz, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%