2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-017-2288-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal and joint probability behavior of temperature extremes over the Himalayan region under changing climate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study evaluated various members of Archimedean Copula family and selected the best members (used in the present study, mentioned later) to apply in the construction of joint probability distributions of rainfall with soil moisture and that of rainfall with run‐off for each of the sub‐basins. Some of the commonly used Archimedean Copula family members are Clayton, Frank, Gumbel, Ali‐Mikhail‐Haq and Joe (Ayantobo et al, 2019; Azam et al, 2018; Fan et al, 2017; Goswami et al, 2018; Reddy & Ganguly, 2011). The criteria of best Copula correspond to a member, which is characterized by the lowest values of Akaike's information criterion (AIC; Akaike, 1974; Maier, 2013; Sadegh et al, 2017; Wang & Liu, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study evaluated various members of Archimedean Copula family and selected the best members (used in the present study, mentioned later) to apply in the construction of joint probability distributions of rainfall with soil moisture and that of rainfall with run‐off for each of the sub‐basins. Some of the commonly used Archimedean Copula family members are Clayton, Frank, Gumbel, Ali‐Mikhail‐Haq and Joe (Ayantobo et al, 2019; Azam et al, 2018; Fan et al, 2017; Goswami et al, 2018; Reddy & Ganguly, 2011). The criteria of best Copula correspond to a member, which is characterized by the lowest values of Akaike's information criterion (AIC; Akaike, 1974; Maier, 2013; Sadegh et al, 2017; Wang & Liu, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.6 | Copula-based joint return period A copula-based joint return period can be used to overcome under-or over-estimates of risk related to extreme events such as floods and droughts. The return period is described as the average interval between successive events (Liu et al, 2015;Uttam et al, 2018). Assuming that x and y are the extreme value thresholds of climatic parameters with the copula function (C (F X (X), F Y (Y)), the joint return period of the two variables, when both the X and Y variables exceed a certain value (…”
Section: Copula-based Conditional Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, copula functions have been used for multivariate analysis of annual peak floods, flood, and drought return periods, and similar climate-related extremes (Bracken, Holman, Rajagopalan, & Moradkhani, 2018;Chen, Zhang, Xiao, Singh, & Zhang, 2016;J. Li, Zhang, Chen, & Singh, 2015;Mesbahzadeh et al, 2019;Mirakbari et al, 2010;Uttam, Goswami, Bhargav, Hazra, & Goyal, 2018;Q. Zhang, Li, Singh, & Xu, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Copulas [23] are known as an effective means for describing the dependence between random variables, thus expected to be suitable for studying competition or dependence among multi-objectives. Recently, different copulas have been employed for the multivariate analysis of spatiotemporal change in probabilistic forecasting of seasonal droughts [24], multivariate real-time droughts assessment [25], joint return periods of precipitation and temperature extremes [26], flood frequency analysis [27,28], risk analysis [29], energy environmental optimization [30][31][32], stochastic hydrological simulation [33] and so on, while its application in the research field of multi-objective competition relationship has not yet emerged. A key feature of copula is to characterize the dependency structure of two or more variables, either cross-correlation or auto-correlation [34], making it a promising method for the multi-objective questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%