2023
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1287089
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal analysis of 3D human iPSC-derived neural networks using a 3D multi-electrode array

Doris Lam,
Heather A. Enright,
Jose Cadena
et al.

Abstract: While there is a growing appreciation of three-dimensional (3D) neural tissues (i.e., hydrogel-based, organoids, and spheroids), shown to improve cellular health and network activity to mirror brain-like activity in vivo, functional assessment using current electrophysiology techniques (e.g., planar multi-electrode arrays or patch clamp) has been technically challenging and limited to surface measurements at the bottom or top of the 3D tissue. As next-generation MEAs, specifically 3D MEAs, are being developed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MEA-based neuro-electronic interfaces are now a well-accepted technique in basic and applied electrophysiology, enabling experimental investigations of collective dynamics, spatiotemporal patterns and computational properties of neuronal assemblies in manners that were inaccessible before ( Frega et al, 2014 ; Obien et al, 2015 ; Forro et al, 2021 ; Tanwar et al, 2022 ). The ability to monitor the functional dynamics of the entire 3D reconstructed neural tissue is a critical bottleneck ( Soscia et al, 2020 ; Choi et al, 2021 ) and inserting MEA probes into 3D neural tissue is a complex challenge, and work is ongoing to develop new generations of suitable (more flexible) probes ( Kireev et al, 2019 ; Park et al, 2021 ; Sharf et al, 2022 ; Cai et al, 2023 ; Lam et al, 2023 ; McDonald et al, 2023 ; Morales Pantoja et al, 2023 ; Yang et al, 2024 ). 3D neural tissues are extremely sensitive to experimental conditions and require adequately designed MEA devices that allow the maintenance of an air-liquid interface around the 3D neural tissue during culture and recording ( McDonald et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEA-based neuro-electronic interfaces are now a well-accepted technique in basic and applied electrophysiology, enabling experimental investigations of collective dynamics, spatiotemporal patterns and computational properties of neuronal assemblies in manners that were inaccessible before ( Frega et al, 2014 ; Obien et al, 2015 ; Forro et al, 2021 ; Tanwar et al, 2022 ). The ability to monitor the functional dynamics of the entire 3D reconstructed neural tissue is a critical bottleneck ( Soscia et al, 2020 ; Choi et al, 2021 ) and inserting MEA probes into 3D neural tissue is a complex challenge, and work is ongoing to develop new generations of suitable (more flexible) probes ( Kireev et al, 2019 ; Park et al, 2021 ; Sharf et al, 2022 ; Cai et al, 2023 ; Lam et al, 2023 ; McDonald et al, 2023 ; Morales Pantoja et al, 2023 ; Yang et al, 2024 ). 3D neural tissues are extremely sensitive to experimental conditions and require adequately designed MEA devices that allow the maintenance of an air-liquid interface around the 3D neural tissue during culture and recording ( McDonald et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%