2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2an35650c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporally resolved detection on a microfluidic chip for monitoring the dynamic processes of molecular events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the k off values for the MIP layers ranged from 10 À5 to 10 À4 s À1 , which are similar to those for other specic binding (10 À4 to 10 À3 s À1 ), 24,25 but lower than those for non-specic binding (10 À2 to 10 À3 s À1 ). [25][26][27] These results suggest that the specic affinity of the MIP layers towards the template was due to the well-fabricated imprinting cavities, rather than non-specic adsorption by the imprinting coating. The binding data shown in Table 1 reveal that even at pH 3, at which boronate affinity interaction was inactivated, the MIP layer still exhibited a strong enough binding strength, reaching the 10 À7 M level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, the k off values for the MIP layers ranged from 10 À5 to 10 À4 s À1 , which are similar to those for other specic binding (10 À4 to 10 À3 s À1 ), 24,25 but lower than those for non-specic binding (10 À2 to 10 À3 s À1 ). [25][26][27] These results suggest that the specic affinity of the MIP layers towards the template was due to the well-fabricated imprinting cavities, rather than non-specic adsorption by the imprinting coating. The binding data shown in Table 1 reveal that even at pH 3, at which boronate affinity interaction was inactivated, the MIP layer still exhibited a strong enough binding strength, reaching the 10 À7 M level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a high-performance separation tool, capillary electrophoresis (CE) provides multiple advantages, including high resolution, speed, easy to automation, minute sample amount requirements, and the possibility to work under near-physiological conditions. These benefits make CE a powerful tool for the characterization of biomolecular interactions. CE has been widely used in investigation of the interactions between small molecules, , drugs and proteins, DNA and proteins, and proteins and proteins, as well as between protein and nanoparticle . Although boronic acids have already been frequently used in CE for the separation and detection of sugar or sugar alcohols , and separation of nucleosides and glycoproteins, to the best of our knowledge, there is no particular work using CE to probe the interactions between boronic acids and cis -diol-containing biomolecules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the k off values for the MIP, the cMIP and the anti‐B2M monoclonal antibody ranged from 10 −4 to 10 −3 s −1 , which are similar to those for other specific binding, but lower than those for nonspecific binding (10 −2 to 10 −3 s −1 ) . [ 41‐44 ] These results suggest that the specific affinity of the MIP and cMIP toward the template was due to the well‐fabricated imprinting cavities, rather than nonspecific adsorption by the imprinting coating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%