The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal variation of outdoor and indoor pesticide air concentrations in homes near agricultural fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The exposure assessment method did not account for potentially relevant factors, such as wind patterns at the time of application or geographic features that may influence pesticide drift, and it also assumes that the participant was at the recorded location during the exposure relevant time or that the agent was still active and exposed the residents after application had occurred. However, being within a certain buffer of a pesticide application is one of the strongest predictors of air concentrations of pesticides, and resuspension from these applications is generally constant over at least a week-long period [55]. We have also previously validated our approach with high specificity for organochlorines with serum measurements [48].…”
Section: Peg Exposure Assessment Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exposure assessment method did not account for potentially relevant factors, such as wind patterns at the time of application or geographic features that may influence pesticide drift, and it also assumes that the participant was at the recorded location during the exposure relevant time or that the agent was still active and exposed the residents after application had occurred. However, being within a certain buffer of a pesticide application is one of the strongest predictors of air concentrations of pesticides, and resuspension from these applications is generally constant over at least a week-long period [55]. We have also previously validated our approach with high specificity for organochlorines with serum measurements [48].…”
Section: Peg Exposure Assessment Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we selected some homes located very close to the fields (<50 m) (N = 16), some more further away (50 m-150 m) (N = 14) and some located between 150 m and 250 m (N = 11). These buffers are based on previous research done on pesticide concentrations at different distances downwind (Siebers et al, 2003;Figueiredo et al, 2021b) and ensured that homes were located both up and down-wind of the application (all cardinal directions). All controls were included in the sample analyses.…”
Section: Homesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance from home to closest agricultural field is used as a spatial variable. See Figueiredo et al for details on collection of both meteorological and spatial variables (section 2.7, Figueiredo et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Questionnaires and Variables Used For Modelling Purposesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Single sampling times in chapter 2/3 and in chapter 4 allowed for the aimed snapshot of soil contamination by pesticides but hampered the evaluation of 6 pesticide use or pesticide degradation dynamics, which are important for management and risk evaluations. Off-site transport of pesticides was estimated from potential water-and wind-erosion rates, but not validated in field, experimental, or modelling setups [similar to what was done for some compounds in (Bento et al, 2019;Figueiredo et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2015)]. Some of the pesticide residues found in soils have also been found in water and/or air by other researchers, but (inter)relations between compartments were assumed to be too speculative.…”
Section: Thesis Shortcomingsmentioning
confidence: 99%