2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-004-0005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio‐temporal variation of colony structure and eusociality level of the Japanese sweat bee Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) duplex (Hymenoptera: Halictidae)

Abstract: Colony structure and eusociality level of the sweat bee Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) duplex were studied in 2001 in Sapporo and Assabu, Hokkaido, northern Japan. Sakagami and his colleagues had also studied this species in Sapporo in 1957-1968. Brood size, sex ratio and queen-worker size dimorphism were geographically and temporally variable, indicating spatio-temporal variation at the eusociality level. Inseminated workers constituted only 7.9% of the populations in 1957-1968 Sapporo but about 60% in 2001 in Sappo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I was interested in whether the pattern of larger colony sizes in the temperate zone would hold if I reanalyzed the data with the latitudinal position of each species (the data had been lumped into either 'tropical' and 'temperate' categories in the original analysis). I selected one subfamily that showed strong support for their hypothesis that colony size was greater in the temperate zone (Formicinae) and one subfamily that (2008) Lasioglossum duplex two habitats in northern Japan degree of sociality intraspecific Hirata et al (2005) appeared to be more neutral (Ponerinae). For Kaspari & Vargo's (1995) analysis, the subfamily Ectatomminae was embedded within Ponerinae, and I separated the two in my own analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I was interested in whether the pattern of larger colony sizes in the temperate zone would hold if I reanalyzed the data with the latitudinal position of each species (the data had been lumped into either 'tropical' and 'temperate' categories in the original analysis). I selected one subfamily that showed strong support for their hypothesis that colony size was greater in the temperate zone (Formicinae) and one subfamily that (2008) Lasioglossum duplex two habitats in northern Japan degree of sociality intraspecific Hirata et al (2005) appeared to be more neutral (Ponerinae). For Kaspari & Vargo's (1995) analysis, the subfamily Ectatomminae was embedded within Ponerinae, and I separated the two in my own analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sweat bees, eusociality is characterized by the behavioural totipotency of all adult females, such that any newly eclosed female is potentially capable of taking on either the queen or worker role (Yanega 1989(Yanega , 1990. The flexibility inherent in the behaviour of individual females is also observed at the level of entire colonies or populations, as there is considerable evidence for both intraand inter-population variation in colony social organisation, especially in response to local climatic conditions (Yanega 1993, Miyanaga et al 1999, Hirata et al 2005, Kocher and Paxton 2014. Ultimately, variation in colony social organisation seems to reflect colony or population-typical outcomes of conflict between queens and workers over control of reproduction, the conflict being moderated by the environmental conditions experienced by individual bees and colonies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bees of the family Halictidae exhibit a great variability with respect to social organization, both within and among species (Hirata et al, 2005;Packer, 1998;Plateaux-QuØnu, 1993;Richards et al, 2003;Yanega, 1988). This extreme social diversity seems to be strongly affected by environmental conditions (for review, see Wcislo, 1997;Yanega, 1997), although a genetic influence on the life strategy is sometimes involved as well (Danforth et al, 2003;Plateaux-QuØnu et al, 2000;Soucy and Danforth, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%