Spatio-Temporal Validation of GNSS-Derived Global Ionosphere Maps Using 16 Years of Jason Satellites Observations

Abstract

Existing ionospheric models perform very well in mapping the calm state of the ionosphere. However, the problem is accurately determining the total electron content (TEC) for disturbed days. Knowledge of the exact electron density is essential for single−frequency receivers, which cannot eliminate the ionospheric delay. This study aims to investigate temporal and spatial variability in the distribution of TEC based on differences between maps of individual Ionospheric Associated Analysis Centers (IAACs) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) and aligned altimetry−TEC from 2005–2021. Based on the temporal distribution, we have observed a significant effect of solar activity on the mean and standard deviation behavior of the differences between global ionospheric maps (GIMs) and Jason−derived TEC. We determined the biases for the entire calculation period, through which it can be concluded that the upcg-Jason and igsg-Jason differences have the lowest standard deviation (±1.81 TECU). In addition, the temporal analysis made it possible to detect annual, semi−annual, and 117-day oscillations occurring in the Jason−TEC data, as well as 121-day oscillations in the GIMs. It also allowed us to analyze the potential sources of these cyclicities, solar and geomagnetic activity, in the case of the annual and semi−annual periodicities. When considering spatial variations, we have observed that the most significant average differences are in the intertropical areas. In contrast, the smallest differences were recorded in the southern hemisphere, below the Tropic of Capricorn (23.5°S). However, the slightest variations were noted for the northern hemisphere above the Tropic of Cancer (23.5°N). Our research presented in this paper allows a better understanding of how different methods of GNSS TEC approximation affect the model’s accuracy.

Transformation of the Shape and Spectrum of an Ultrawideband Electromagnetic Pulse in a “Gigantic” Coaxial Line Filled with Magnetized Plasma

“…According to the results of the calculations [4], the character of EMP distortion in plasma is determined by the total electron content (TEC) on the signal propagation path [27,28]:…”

“…TEC can be regarded as the scaling parameter when simulating the dispersion EMP distortion in the ionosphere [4]. For the F layer of the dayside ionosphere, TEC ~10-40 TECu = 10 13 − 4 × 10 13 cm −2 (TECu is the TEC unit, 1 TECu = 10 12 cm −2 [28]). In the GCL, the typical values of TEC are ~2 × 10 −3 -0.2 TECu = 2 × 10 8 -2 × 10 11 cm −2 .…”