Spatio-temporal skin strain distributions evoke low variability spike responses in cuneate neurons

Abstract

A common method to explore the somatosensory function of the brain is to relate skin stimuli to neurophysiological recordings. However, interaction with the skin involves complex mechanical effects. Variability in mechanically induced spike responses is likely to be due in part to mechanical variability of the transformation of stimuli into spiking patterns in the primary sensors located in the skin. This source of variability greatly hampers detailed investigations of the response of the brain to different types of mechanical stimuli. A novel stimulation technique designed to minimize the uncertainty in the strain distributions induced in the skin was applied to evoke responses in single neurons in the cat. We show that exposure to specific spatio-temporal stimuli induced highly reproducible spike responses in the cells of the cuneate nucleus, which represents the first stage of integration of peripheral inputs to the brain. Using precisely controlled spatio-temporal stimuli, we also show that cuneate neurons, as a whole, were selectively sensitive to the spatial and to the temporal aspects of the stimuli. We conclude that the present skin stimulation technique based on localized differential tractions greatly reduces response variability that is exogenous to the information processing of the brain and hence paves the way for substantially more detailed investigations of the brain's somatosensory system.

Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands

“…Indeed, whenever we move the hand and we contact an external object, the somatosensory system receives multiple afferent signals from the musculoskeletal system (e.g., [153,154]), and the skin (e.g., [139,155–157]). Our brain fuses these signals to produce a unique and coherent representation of the hands position, contact orientation and motion.…”

“…The study was made possible by likewise recent advances in psychophysics/robotics where a haptic interface designed to explore haptic illusions in humans had been developed [157]. The novel idea being tested was that the somatosensory functions of the brain are based on the fundamental input features defined by contact mechanics [137] rather than the classical neuroscience concepts of receptive fields and sub-modalities.…”

Artificial spatiotemporal touch inputs reveal complementary decoding in neocortical neurons

“…But the mechanical activation of the skin6, the mechanotransduction into an electrical receptor potential and the spike generation from that receptor potential in the tactile afferent axon7 are potential sources of noise that could result in variability in the spatiotemporal pattern from one trial to another289. In addition, even small shifts in the position of a mechanical stimulus would result in that the spatiotemporal pattern of skin sensor activation shifts across the recruited population of sensors, which at the level of the decoding in the neuronal circuitry corresponds to a different task, even though the perception may be essentially the same.…”

Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex related to tactile exploration

“…In our opinion, all skin mechanoreceptors respond to normal and tangential forces, both of which involve skin strain. The monkeys appeared to adjust their normal contact forces voluntarily, quite possibly, to maintain a maximum compliance and consequently, maximizing sensations arising from changes in skin strain (Hayward et al 2014;Serina et al 1997). Neuron selection.…”

“…It suggests that the explored surface had greater influence than the target saliency in the modulation of finger forces. The increase in tangential force accompanied by a decrease in normal force suggests a strategy that may have served to maintain a relatively constant resultant force vector under 1.0 N to optimize skin compliance (Hayward et al 2014;Serina et al 1997) and maximize the sensitivity to changes in skin strain.…”