2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.spasta.2013.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal modeling for real-time ozone forecasting

Abstract: The accurate assessment of exposure to ambient ozone concentrations is important for informing the public and pollution monitoring agencies about ozone levels that may lead to adverse health effects. High-resolution air quality information can offer significant health benefits by leading to improved environmental decisions. A practical challenge facing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is to provide real-time forecasting of current 8-hour average ozone exposure over the entire conterminous Unite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ambient exposure is routinely evaluated through pollutant measurements collected by monitoring stations. Since stations are usually sparse across space, pollutant measurements are customarily interpolated across space and over time (Lee and Shaddick, ; Berrocal et al ., ; Paci et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ambient exposure is routinely evaluated through pollutant measurements collected by monitoring stations. Since stations are usually sparse across space, pollutant measurements are customarily interpolated across space and over time (Lee and Shaddick, ; Berrocal et al ., ; Paci et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…I chose to apply a search similar to Paci, Gelfand, and Holland () for the optimal ϕ value by fitting the current dataset with values of ϕ starting at 10 and decreasing by an order of magnitude of 1 for each subsequent fitting. Once the model achieved an acceptance rate closest to 32%, that model was then used to obtain forecasting estimates for year J .…”
Section: Assessment Of Forecast Performance Via Cross‐validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I chose to apply a search similar to Paci, Gelfand, and Holland (2013) for the optimal ϕ value by fitting the current dataset with values of ϕ starting at 10 and decreasing by an order of magni- The A and A 1 models were inadequate for forecasting annual catch by location for any of the four species in the analysis. Previous studies indicated that ARIMA models outperform other linear time series methods when forecasting monthly data (Stergiou, Christou, & Petrakis, 1997); however, ARIMA is less suited to yearly data (Stergiou & Christou, 1996) and nonlinear time series (Koutroumanidis et al, 2006 Notes.…”
Section: Control Of Bayesian Parameter ϕ In Crossvalidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, our models run locally in real time, while incorporating the novelty in considering first‐ and second‐stage AR specifications along with a periodic component and heterogeneous variances. The only other real‐time forecasting work we are aware was developed using first differences along with spatiotemporally varying coefficients is that by Paci, Gelfand, and Holland (). Our temperature‐driven forecasting can substantially reduce the calibration error propagated from computer models such as η ‐CMAQ in the work of Paci et al ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%