2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72084-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-Temporal Learning from Longitudinal Data for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, results showed the usefulness of longitudinal segmentation as the U-Net network with the baseline PET and baseline lesion segmentation as inputs had significantly better results than the U-Net network (0.58 vs. 0.50). These results are in accordance with Denner et al [ 19 ], who observed performance improvement with longitudinal networks using two time-points. In addition, on PET images, lesion contrast can be very different between two acquisitions, due to the patient’s treatment response, as shown in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, results showed the usefulness of longitudinal segmentation as the U-Net network with the baseline PET and baseline lesion segmentation as inputs had significantly better results than the U-Net network (0.58 vs. 0.50). These results are in accordance with Denner et al [ 19 ], who observed performance improvement with longitudinal networks using two time-points. In addition, on PET images, lesion contrast can be very different between two acquisitions, due to the patient’s treatment response, as shown in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, most of these deep-learning techniques focus on a single acquisition, while lesion segmentation on multiple time points is required to assess treatment response. Recently, methods were developed for the monitoring of multiple sclerosis lesions [ 19 , 20 , 21 ] and the assessment of rectal cancer response [ 22 ] on longitudinal MRI images. Denner et al [ 19 ] proposed a U-Net with input channels for each acquisition and an auxiliary self-supervised registration task to guide lesion segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inspired by the work of Balakrishnan et al ( 2019 ) to compute the deformation field (DF), Salem et al ( 2020 ) developed a new approach to simultaneously learn the nonlinear DF between follow-up and baseline and from the learned DF and input images learn the segmentation mask. Denner et al ( 2021 ) used the same shared encoder and different decoders to learn the tasks of segmentation and non-rigid registration. To improve the lesion map segmentation, Gessert et al ( 2020 ) extended the 4D context by adding a temporal history and adding convGRU to aggregate the 3D representations from encoders to be passed to the decoder for the final prediction map.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%