Spatio‐temporal distribution of Anthonomus grandis grandis Boh. in tropical cotton fields

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the spatio-temporal distribution of pests is important for the development of accurate management approaches. The boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boh., is a deleterious cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., pest in the western hemisphere. The spread of boll weevils across cotton fields remains poorly understood. We assessed the dispersal pattern of adult weevils through cotton fields cultivated in a tropical area during dry and wet seasons using geostatistics for the number of adults and infested reproductive structures (buds, bolls and total). RESULTS: Adult weevils and infested reproductive structures increased across both seasons despite the prevailing climatic variables. In both seasons, boll weevil adults and infested reproductive structures followed an aggregated distribution. The distances over which samples maintained spatial dependence varied from 0.7 to 43.4 m in the dry season and from 6.0 to 614.4 m in the wet season. Boll weevil infestations started at field borders and the infested reproductive structures (oviposition and/or feeding punctured) were greater than the adults regardless of cotton growth stage.CONCLUSION: Sampling for boll weevils in cotton fields should start at the field borders and focus on total infested reproductive structures (buds + bolls) and as cotton plants develop, sampling should focus on the field as a whole. Distances among samples will vary from 6 to 470 m. Thus, despite the cotton phenological stage or growing season, monitoring of boll weevil should be done by sampling total infested reproductive structures with a minimum distance of 6 m among samples.

Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa Insecticidal Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) Are Highly Toxic to Anthonomus grandis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Larvae

“…These applications can be performed weekly until the insect is no longer detected. Consequently, the field may receive as many as 25 applications in a single growing season, boosting expenses regarding agricultural inputs, and negatively affecting the environment and entomofauna [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. However, the low effectiveness of the available synthetic agents has contributed to inefficient control measures, an increase in the insect population, and its genetic diversity.…”