2022
DOI: 10.3354/meps14096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal diet variability of the California sea lion Zalophus californianus in the southern California Current Ecosystem

Abstract: Characterizing predator diets is essential to understanding food web dynamics. We investigated the dietary breadth and variation of the California sea lion (CSL) Zalophus californianus at 3 of the California Channel Islands from 1981-2015. Prey species were identified from hard parts and soft-tissue remains of pyrosomes recovered from fecal samples, revealing a diverse diet of fish and cephalopods. Percent frequency of occurrence and percent split-sample frequency of occurrence were used to describe long-term … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that pollock increased in abundance and was the dominant groundfish in the Gulf at the time of the decline (the 1970s-1980s, Mueter and Norcross, 2002, also suggested diet composition may be more important than simply prey abundance. Diet diversity per se may not simply reflect the status of the prey field to sea lions as simple measures of diet diversity may be unrelated to population trends (Fritz et al, 2019) and switching from rich, preferred prey to unpreferred and more diverse prey during poor conditions may also occur (Lowry et al, 2022). Increased diet diversity also occurred after the PMH in the winter diet of Steller sea lions around Chiswell, due to a strong reduction in capelin coupled with an increased utilization of a variety of benthic and poorer-quality prey (Maniscalco, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that pollock increased in abundance and was the dominant groundfish in the Gulf at the time of the decline (the 1970s-1980s, Mueter and Norcross, 2002, also suggested diet composition may be more important than simply prey abundance. Diet diversity per se may not simply reflect the status of the prey field to sea lions as simple measures of diet diversity may be unrelated to population trends (Fritz et al, 2019) and switching from rich, preferred prey to unpreferred and more diverse prey during poor conditions may also occur (Lowry et al, 2022). Increased diet diversity also occurred after the PMH in the winter diet of Steller sea lions around Chiswell, due to a strong reduction in capelin coupled with an increased utilization of a variety of benthic and poorer-quality prey (Maniscalco, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former seems more likely, given how closely large pelagic predators group in the crossregion biplot. This grouping also suggests similar feeding habits for these predators over both southern and Central California regions on a diverse array of pelagic prey, including gadids, perciforms, beloniforms, clupeids, myopsid squid, and oegopsid squid (e.g., Melin et al, 2012a;Preti et al, 2012;Thompson et al, 2019;Lowry et al, 2022).…”
Section: Ecological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Northern Fur Seal samples were therefore attributed to both bioregions. California Sea Lion diet composition data are mainly derived from adult females sampled in the Channel Islands (Melin et al, 2012a;Lowry et al, 2022). Adult females from San Clemente and San Nicolas Island typically forage within the Southern California Bight and were therefore assigned to the Southern California bioregion.…”
Section: Biogeographic Designationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frequency of occurrence (FO) is a robust metric in diet analysis studies for quantifying prey prevalence, while avoiding the pitfalls inherent in other gut content metrics (Baker et al, 2014), especially as methods of diet sample collection and processing varied across taxa and collections. FO is calculated as the total number of stomachs [or scats for marine mammals inhabiting onshore colonies, see (Lowry et al, 2022)], containing a prey taxon of interest, divided by the total number of non-empty stomachs for that given predator taxa. We first determined which of the predators in the CCTD database had consumed any mesopelagic fish prey (Figure 1A).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%