2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal anomalous diffusion imaging: results in controlled phantoms and in excised human meningiomas

Abstract: Recently, we measured two anomalous diffusion (AD) parameters: the spatial and the temporal AD indices, called γ and α, respectively, by using spectroscopic pulse gradient field methods. We showed that γ quantifies pseudo-superdiffusion processes, while α quantifies subdiffusion processes. Here, we propose γ and α maps obtained in a controlled heterogeneous phantom, comprised of packed micro-beads in water and in excised human meningiomas. In few words, α maps represent the multi-scale spatial distribution of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(65 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently, opposite behavior is observed in blue‐ROIs. This result is in agreement with in vivo results obtained by De Santis et al , and can be explained by water pseudo‐superdiffusion processes . Indeed, Δ χ H2O‐TISSUE spatial distribution introduces spurious effects on PFG signal decay that can emulate an apparent super diffusion behavior, which in turn affects the quantification of the effective non‐Gaussian diffusion of water in experiments performed by conventional DKI techniques.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistently, opposite behavior is observed in blue‐ROIs. This result is in agreement with in vivo results obtained by De Santis et al , and can be explained by water pseudo‐superdiffusion processes . Indeed, Δ χ H2O‐TISSUE spatial distribution introduces spurious effects on PFG signal decay that can emulate an apparent super diffusion behavior, which in turn affects the quantification of the effective non‐Gaussian diffusion of water in experiments performed by conventional DKI techniques.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Some authors have recently highlighted that susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) may potentially provide a complementary method, compared with DTI, for fiber tracts reconstruction, thanks to the existence of magnetic susceptibility anisotropy in the WM . Moreover, recent works suggest that non‐Gaussian diffusion of biological water, performed by using diffusion‐gradient strength varying pulsed field gradient (PFG) MRI experiments, is affected by magnetic susceptibility difference between extracellular water and tissue molecules ( Δ χ H2O‐TISSUE ) in a nonnegligible way. As a matter of fact, the spatial distribution of Δ χ H2O‐TISSUE in the brain tissue can provide information about WM spatial distribution, orientation and structural modifications as well as WM and gray matter (GM) different alterations due to specific diseases .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical evaluation of the obtained formulas demonstrates that our solutions replicate the super-diffusive and sub-diffusive regimes reported in MRI studies. These have been previously shown to arise from local magnetisation gradients between compartments with different magnetic susceptibility, capillary perfusion, porous media or stationary random flows, intravoxel incoherent motion, and hindered transport in densely packed and heterogeneous structures [14]. Moreover, our solutions at the end of the sequence exhibit residual phase shifts as those associated with the microscopic motion (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The main advantage of such an approach is that insights can A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T be derived from generalisations of the physical principles describing the magnetisation of water protons in MRI: the Bloch-Torrey equation [13]. This can have important implications in understanding the different contributions of tissue microstructure to anomalous diffusion [14], compared to the fitting of experimental data to phenomenological signal decays such as bi-exponential [15] or stretched-exponential models [16]. However, an important drawback of the fractional setting is the complexity of its associated non-local operators for the derivation of exact solutions for the acquired signal decay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-3 This deviation, which is often referred to as non-Gaussian diffusion, is accentuated as the b-value increases.Over the past two decades, considerable efforts have been invested to elucidate non-Gaussian diffusion in biological systems. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] While the efforts by the diffusion MRI community have yielded a wealth of models to improve characterization of the MR signals and probe various aspects of tissue microstructures, it is important to recognize that recent efforts by the biophysics community have also produced valuable new insights into the fundamental diffusion phenomena in biological systems, particularly those related to anomalous diffusion-a sub-class of non-Gaussian diffusion.Anomalous diffusion refers to a diffusion process in which the statistical description of mean squared displacement of the diffusing molecules follows a nonlinear, power-law relationship with time, asymptotically in the limit of infinite times. 15,16 Among numerous anomalous diffusion models, the continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) model and the fractional motion (FM) model are actively pursued by the biophysics community and regarded as the major "archrivals".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%