2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017jb015158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially Varying Stress State in the Central U.S. From Bayesian Inversion of Focal Mechanism and In Situ Maximum Horizontal Stress Orientation Data

Abstract: The crustal stress state in the Midcontinent of the United States has been a focus of research for many years due to anomalously high rates of seismicity in the region. This interest is recently renewed because of ongoing wastewater injection and CO2 sequestration in the Illinois Basin and its potential to induce seismicity. When fluid is injected, pore pressure increases, decreasing effective normal stress and increasing the potential for faults optimally oriented with respect to the direction of maximum comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To rectify this problem, Hardebeck and Michael (2006) developed a damped least squares method of focal mechanism data, which minimized the difference in the stress state between adjacent subareas. This was further extended to a nonlinear inversion with a fully Bayesian formalism (Carlson et al., 2018). Iwata (2018) also constructed a spatially continuous inversion method of P‐wave first motion data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To rectify this problem, Hardebeck and Michael (2006) developed a damped least squares method of focal mechanism data, which minimized the difference in the stress state between adjacent subareas. This was further extended to a nonlinear inversion with a fully Bayesian formalism (Carlson et al., 2018). Iwata (2018) also constructed a spatially continuous inversion method of P‐wave first motion data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inversion results of traditional optimize methods are all prone to being trapped by local minima, can only determine the best-fit model and not provide quantitatively nonlinear uncertainty estimation of the awaiting inversion parameters. In recent years, the Bayesian inversion method underwent considerable development and significantly contributed to estimating bottom properties and their uncertainties based on a Bayesian formulation [15][16][17][18][19]. The Bayesian inversion method is a global optimization algorithm based on the probability theory, applied mathematics, and optimization theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%