2014
DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-8173-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially resolving methane emissions in California: constraints from the CalNex aircraft campaign and from present (GOSAT, TES) and future (TROPOMI, geostationary) satellite observations

Abstract: Abstract. We apply a continental-scale inverse modeling system for North America based on the GEOS-Chem model to optimize California methane emissions at 1/2 • × 2/3 • horizontal resolution using atmospheric observations from the CalNex aircraft campaign (May-June 2010) and from satellites. Inversion of the CalNex data yields a best estimate for total California methane emissions of 2.86 ± 0.21 Tg a −1 , compared with 1.92 Tg a −1 in the EDGAR v4.2 emission inventory used as a priori and 1.51 Tg a −1 in the Ca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
154
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(43 reference statements)
10
154
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, several top-down studies indicate that the California state inventory is likely too low by a factor of 1.2 to 1.9 (Jeong et al, 2013Wecht et al, 2014b), and several top-down studies estimate emissions for oil and gas drilling regions of Utah and Colorado that are up to 3 times bottom-up estimates (e.g., Karion et al, 2013;Pétron et al, 2014). Overall, total US CH 4 emissions are likely ∼50 % larger than estimated by EDGAR or the US EPA Wecht et al, 2014a;Turner et al, 2015).…”
Section: Impact Of Recent Advancesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, several top-down studies indicate that the California state inventory is likely too low by a factor of 1.2 to 1.9 (Jeong et al, 2013Wecht et al, 2014b), and several top-down studies estimate emissions for oil and gas drilling regions of Utah and Colorado that are up to 3 times bottom-up estimates (e.g., Karion et al, 2013;Pétron et al, 2014). Overall, total US CH 4 emissions are likely ∼50 % larger than estimated by EDGAR or the US EPA Wecht et al, 2014a;Turner et al, 2015).…”
Section: Impact Of Recent Advancesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the relative magnitude of the source sectors in any one grid box will be the same as in the bottom-up inventory. Wecht et al (2014b) and Jeong et al (2016) leverage this strategy to estimate CH 4 emissions for California using aircraft and tower-based observations, respectively. Like Zhao et al (2009) and Jeong et al (2013), they also find higher emissions from agriculture relative to EDGAR.…”
Section: State-and National-scale Inverse Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach therefore implicitly assumes that the sign of the a priori flux (which can be negative over the ocean) is correct for each model grid square. The GEOS-Chem adjoint has previously been applied to a wide range of inverse problems for atmospheric composition, including constraining sources and sinks of long-lived greenhouse gases such as CO 2 (Deng et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014;Deng et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2015), methane (Wecht et al, 2014;Turner et al, 2015a), and N 2 O (Wells et al, 2015), as well as aerosols and reactive trace gases (e.g., Henze et al, 2007;Kopacz et al, 2009;Wells et al, 2014).…”
Section: Standard 4d-var Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both LPDM and mass balance are limited to linear tracer problems where observations are recorded under specific meteorological conditions. Wecht et al (2014) used GEOS-Chem in an analytical inversion to compare constraints from the CalNex aircraft measurements with those from present and future satellite observations of CH 4 throughout California. Although an analytical inversion does not require an adjoint, the approach is limited, computationally, to constraining only a few sources, which imposes aggregation error (Mao et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%