46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-6779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially-Resolved Beam Current and Charge-State Distributions for the NEXT Ion Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the current density dropoff on the outer side of the profile occurs more rapidly at higher beam currents. This is consistent with previous measurements on NEXT using a similar set of ion optics, which showed that beam divergence decreased with increasing beam current at 1179 V. 6 Figure 17 shows that the dropoff also occurs further from thruster centerline at higher beam currents, an indication that the beam itself is flatter at these conditions. The normalized value of current density at thruster centerline monatonically increases with increasing beam current.…”
Section: Comparisons At Constant Beam Voltage and Currentsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the current density dropoff on the outer side of the profile occurs more rapidly at higher beam currents. This is consistent with previous measurements on NEXT using a similar set of ion optics, which showed that beam divergence decreased with increasing beam current at 1179 V. 6 Figure 17 shows that the dropoff also occurs further from thruster centerline at higher beam currents, an indication that the beam itself is flatter at these conditions. The normalized value of current density at thruster centerline monatonically increases with increasing beam current.…”
Section: Comparisons At Constant Beam Voltage and Currentsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…On the outer side of the peak, however, the current density drops off most rapidly at moderate beam voltages around 679 V. The reason for this is due to a combination of beam divergence and CEX population effects. Previous measurements on NEXT using a similar set of ion optics have shown that at a beam current of 1.20 A, the beam divergence was minimized at a beam voltage of 679 V. 6 This is consistent with the data on the outer side of the peak current density, which shows the most rapid falloff occurring around 679 V -a more rapid falloff is indicative of a more collimated beam. Thus, the trend on the outer side of the profile is attributed to beam divergence effects.…”
Section: Comparisons At Constant Beam Voltage and Currentsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examinations of the beam current density and xenon charge-state distribution as functions of position on the accelerator grid have been completed. [18] The angular dependence of beam current was measured at intermediate and far-field distances to assist with plume modeling and to evaluate the thrust loss due to beam divergence. Thrust correction factors were derived from the data.…”
Section: Nasa's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (Next)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although using the measured thrust defeats one of the original purpose of the phenomenological model (which is to provide a check on the thrustderived anode efficiency), it will give us a more realistic check on how well we have chosen our integration limits. Equation (8) shows how the mass utilization efficiency is estimated from the measured thrust.…”
Section: Efficiency Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%