2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially Offset Active Galactic Nuclei. I. Selection and Spectroscopic Properties

Abstract: We present a sample of 18optically selected and X-ray-detected spatially offset active galactic nuclei (AGNs) from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). In ninesystems, the X-ray active galactic nucleus (AGN) is spatially offset from the galactic stellar core that is located within the 3″ diameter SDSS spectroscopic fiber. In 11systems, the X-ray AGN is spatially offset from a stellar core that is located outside the fiber, with an overlap of two. To build the sample, we cross-matched Type II AGNs selected f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
3
56
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The offset between the dynamical center of the second disk and the secondary outflow is on the order of 3 kpc. We note that this is a typical separation that is found between the stellar centroid and AGN location in local late-stage mergers (Liu et al 2013b;Comerford et al 2015;Barrows et al 2016). We infer that the 3C 298 system likely has two massive galaxies with distinct rotating disks that are currently experiencing a close passage, where their galactic nuclei and SMBHs have yet to merge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The offset between the dynamical center of the second disk and the secondary outflow is on the order of 3 kpc. We note that this is a typical separation that is found between the stellar centroid and AGN location in local late-stage mergers (Liu et al 2013b;Comerford et al 2015;Barrows et al 2016). We infer that the 3C 298 system likely has two massive galaxies with distinct rotating disks that are currently experiencing a close passage, where their galactic nuclei and SMBHs have yet to merge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We note that due to insufficient counts, coupled with the fact the exact location of the galaxy nuclei is uncertain in the advanced mergers in our sample (see SDSS images in Figure 1), it is impossible to quantify any possible spatial offsets between the positions of the detected Chandra sources and the actual galactic nuclei. It is therefore not possible to determine using these observations alone if some of the mergers host offset AGNs, another unambiguous signature of a galaxy merger that can probe AGN triggering through galaxy interactions (Barrows et al 2016(Barrows et al , 2017. We note that for sources within the 2′ of the boresight, the absolute accuracy of source locations on the ACIS-S chip has a 90% uncertainty radius of  0.…”
Section: Chandra Acis Imaging Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VLA observations are complementary to the optical longslit data and together they can fully constrain 1 Spatially-resolved imaging of X-ray sources (e.g., Komossa et al 2003;Mazzarella et al 2012;Barrows et al 2016) that are coincident with emission-line peaks can also confirm the presence of dual AGNs. In this paper series we focus on radio observations as a method for confirming dual AGNs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%