2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially explicit characterization of boreal forest gap dynamics using multi-temporal lidar data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
127
4
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
127
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are slightly less accurate compared to the studies by Gaulton and Malthus (2010) who reported an overall accuracy of 88% in Picea sitchensis plantation in the UK and Vepakomma et al (2008) with an accuracy of 96% in mature forests in Canada. Both studies were carried out in managed forests with a relatively flat terrain and the canopy gaps are caused by different disturbance agents such as forest fires, spruce budworm outbreaks, wind-throw, and tree-falls.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are slightly less accurate compared to the studies by Gaulton and Malthus (2010) who reported an overall accuracy of 88% in Picea sitchensis plantation in the UK and Vepakomma et al (2008) with an accuracy of 96% in mature forests in Canada. Both studies were carried out in managed forests with a relatively flat terrain and the canopy gaps are caused by different disturbance agents such as forest fires, spruce budworm outbreaks, wind-throw, and tree-falls.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…To identify forest canopy gaps, we used gap indicator function G for a given cell at (x, y) on the CHM (Vepakomma et al, 2008) defined as (Eq. 7.1):…”
Section: Analyzing Forest Canopy Gaps Induced By Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Provided that an accurate digital terrain model (DTM) exists, canopy height models, which have become popular for disturbance analysis by means of canopy gaps or canopy height profiles (Fujita et al 2003, Henbo et al 2004, Vepakomma et al 2010, could be calculated by subtracting the terrain model from the surface model , Vepakomma et al 2008. However, for our study area in the Ukraine, as well as for many other countries, accurate DTMs are lacking.…”
Section: Canopy Gap Assessment Using High-resolution Stereo Satellitementioning
confidence: 99%