2018
DOI: 10.5194/essd-10-1795-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially distributed water-balance and meteorological data from the rain–snow transition, southern Sierra Nevada, California

Abstract: Abstract. We strategically placed spatially distributed sensors to provide representative measures of changes in snowpack and subsurface water storage, plus the fluxes affecting these stores, in a set of nested headwater catchments. The high temporal frequency and distributed coverage make the resulting data appropriate for process studies of snow accumulation and melt, infiltration, evapotranspiration, catchment water balance, (bio)geochemistry, and other critical-zone processes. We present 8 years of hourly … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data were obtained from two KREW meteorological stations (Hunsaker & Safeeq, 2018), one located near the upper part of P303 at 1984 masl and a second located between the P301 and P303 stream gauges at 1750 masl ( Figure 1). To improve the timing of soilwater infiltration, snow, and rain phases at a daily time step were inputted into the model separately using a binary process where precipitation was designated as a snow event if the acoustic depth sensors (Bales et al, 2018a) located at either meteorological station recorded an increase in snow depth; otherwise it was labelled a rain event.…”
Section: Model Setup Calibration Validation and Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data were obtained from two KREW meteorological stations (Hunsaker & Safeeq, 2018), one located near the upper part of P303 at 1984 masl and a second located between the P301 and P303 stream gauges at 1750 masl ( Figure 1). To improve the timing of soilwater infiltration, snow, and rain phases at a daily time step were inputted into the model separately using a binary process where precipitation was designated as a snow event if the acoustic depth sensors (Bales et al, 2018a) located at either meteorological station recorded an increase in snow depth; otherwise it was labelled a rain event.…”
Section: Model Setup Calibration Validation and Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modelled streamflow was compared to observed data that were measured from dual Parshall Montana flumes in each of the watersheds (Hunsaker & Safeeq, 2017). Three additional parameters affecting snowmelt were calibrated to observed snow water equivalent (SWE) obtained from a snow pillow at the upper Providence meteorological station (Bales et al, 2018a) (Table 2).…”
Section: Model Setup Calibration Validation and Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average air temperatures decrease from 17 to 0°C with elevation, with wet-season temperatures decreasing from 10 to −7°C (Figure 2(b)). Based on observations at the nearby Kings River Experimental Watersheds (Figure 1), the phase of precipitation transitions from mostly rain to mostly snow across an elevation range of approximately 1,500-2,100 m (i.e., rain-snow transition zone) (Bales et al, 2018;Dahlgren et al, 1997).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area exhibits a Mediterranean climate characterized by cool to cold, wet winters and warm to hot, dry summers. Annual precipitation increases threefold with elevation, from approximately 36 to 113 cm year −1 (Figure 2 Water Resources Research mostly rain to mostly snow across an elevation range of approximately 1,500-2,100 m (i.e., rain-snow transition zone) (Bales et al, 2018;Dahlgren et al, 1997).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is unclear if the methods developed for the reconstruction of other meteorological parameters are also easily applicable for snow depth time series. Additionally, for inter-station approaches there might be the problem of different relationships during accumulation and ablation phase between stations which could hinder such approaches (Bales et al, 2018). This might be especially true for stations at different elevations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%