1995
DOI: 10.1121/1.413410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially dependent acoustic cues generated by the external ear of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus

Abstract: To measure the directionality of the external ear of the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus, the left or right eardrum of a dead bat was replaced by a microphone which recorded signals received from a sound source that was moved around the stationary head. The test signal was a 0.5-ms FM sweep from 100 kHz to 10 kHz (covering all frequencies in the bat's biosonar sounds). Notches and peaks in transfer functions for 7 tested ears varied systematically with changes in elevation. For the most prominent notch, cen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
57
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The creation of strong sidelobes by pinna features has been demonstrated in two different vespertilionid species: In the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus, Palisot de Beauvois, 1796), numerical analysis of the acoustic function of the tragus has supported the conclusion that the tragus creates a pronounced notch and sidelobe in elevation (Müller 2004). This finding aligns well with behavioral experiments (Lawrence and Simmons 1982) and measurements from the bat pinna in the same species (Wotton et al 1995;Aytekin et al 2004). Similarly, a flap on the interior surface of the pinna was found to be responsible for the formation of a pronounced sidelobe in the brown long-eared bat (Plecotus auritus, L., 1758) (Müller et al 2008).…”
Section: Functional Properties Of the Static Noseleaf And Pinna Geometrysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The creation of strong sidelobes by pinna features has been demonstrated in two different vespertilionid species: In the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus, Palisot de Beauvois, 1796), numerical analysis of the acoustic function of the tragus has supported the conclusion that the tragus creates a pronounced notch and sidelobe in elevation (Müller 2004). This finding aligns well with behavioral experiments (Lawrence and Simmons 1982) and measurements from the bat pinna in the same species (Wotton et al 1995;Aytekin et al 2004). Similarly, a flap on the interior surface of the pinna was found to be responsible for the formation of a pronounced sidelobe in the brown long-eared bat (Plecotus auritus, L., 1758) (Müller et al 2008).…”
Section: Functional Properties Of the Static Noseleaf And Pinna Geometrysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…1, bottom row) tend to have prominent side lobes that change direction in a frequency-dependent fashion. Previously published bat biosonar beam patterns of LDC [13][14][15][16] and HDC bats [17] support the existence of these differences. The beam patterns of HDC bats are well suited for on-axis target detection or identification but are not well adapted for estimating target direction based on spectral signatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The operating range of the big brown bat's echolocation system is limited, by spherical spreading and atmospheric attenuation of ultrasound, to an effective range of about 5m for detecting insects (Kick and Simmons, 1984). The effective angular field-of-view is less limited by the transmit and receive beam patterns, which are very broad (140deg at 25kHz to 60deg at 80kHz, −6dB) (Aytekin et al, 2004;Ghose and Moss, 2003;Hartley and Suthers, 1989;Jen and Chen, 1988;Wotton et al, 1995), than by auditory computations that create a narrower (20-25deg) frontal zone of protection from clutter masking (Bates et al, 2011;Sümer et al, 2009). In sparsely cluttered environments, E. fuscus scans its surroundings by aiming its sonar beam at relevant objects (Surlykke et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%