2013
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2013.010313.122343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially Coupled Repeat-Accumulate Codes

Abstract: In this paper we propose a new class of spatially coupled codes based on repeat-accumulate protographs. We show that spatially coupled repeat-accumulate codes have several advantages over spatially coupled low-density parity-check codes including simpler encoders and slightly higher code rates than spatially coupled low-density parity-check codes with similar thresholds and decoding complexity (as measured by the Tanner graph edge density).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This copy-and-permute operation is called lifting and avoids small girths which often harm iterative decoding. In the following, we review four relevant constructions: the standard (l, r, L) P construction [6], a spatially coupled RA (SC-RA) construction [7] and a spatially coupled TAR4JA (SC-TAR4JA) construction [3].…”
Section: Constructions and Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This copy-and-permute operation is called lifting and avoids small girths which often harm iterative decoding. In the following, we review four relevant constructions: the standard (l, r, L) P construction [6], a spatially coupled RA (SC-RA) construction [7] and a spatially coupled TAR4JA (SC-TAR4JA) construction [3].…”
Section: Constructions and Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have k = r l , k ∈ N VNs per regular (l, r) protograph and the code rate is calculated from the protograph as r (l,r,L)P = 1 − (L+l−1) kL . B. RA(q, L) Construction RA LDPC block codes are coupled as described in [7]. The uncoupled RA graphs contain message VNs and accumulator VNs.…”
Section: Constructions and Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is later known that the finite-length performance of spatiallycoupled ARJA codes is rather worse than that of other spatially-coupled codes due to their inferior scaling behavior [15]. On the contrary, spatially-coupled repeat accumulate (SC-RA) codes [16] show the best finite-length performance compared to other spatially-coupled codes [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%